• Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • News
  • Reviews
  • Features
  • Editorials
  • Long Term Tests
  • Video

Dual-Clutch Gearboxes for the Future?

Chris Haak/16 Feb, 09/950/0
Features

By James Wong

02.16.2009

For a long while now, people have had to live with compromises regarding their choice of gearbox. They either choose an all-out manual gearbox, one which may require a deft coordination of the hands and legs to shift gears, and, If one were to be stuck in traffic, that gearbox would be quite a physical workout as well.

Or, they would go for a torque-converter automatic, which smooths things out quite a bit, offering fuss-free motoring at the expense of fuel consumption and what some might call ‘driver feel’.

Another alternative, a semi-automatic clutch-less manual, which is commonly found in cars with a sportier outlook, like the F430 or the Gallardo, offers a manual gearbox but with a computer shifting the gears for you. Like in an F1 car, you control shifts via paddles behind the steering wheel. Sounds like the best of both worlds, but by and large their jerky nature while shifting puts off all but the most tolerant of drivers.

A continuously-variable transmission is a belt-driven gearbox, which dampens the responsiveness of the car to throttle inputs, but it’s a frugal and smooth gearbox – still, not quite suitable for sporty purposes. For a long time a solution has yet to be found – until the appearance of the dual-clutch gearbox in recent times.

Consider this dual-clutch gearbox a superior version of the semi-automatic clutch-less manual. Very much like the latter, the dual-clutch gearbox works just like a manual; a computer shifts for you, hence negating the need for a clutch for the driver to work. However, the similarities end there. Whereas the latter employs a single clutch to engage the gears one by one, a dual clutch gearbox employs two.

I’ll try to explain it in my layman terms, so bear with me – one clutch engages gear 1, 3 and 5 while another engages 2, 4 and 6. Let’s say a car moves off and engages gear 1; another clutch already then readies to engage gear 2, resulting in an almost instantaneous millisecond shift. By the time the car is at gear two, the clutch responsible for gear 1, 3 and 5 already prepares to engage gear 3, and so forth. This relatively simple idea immediately makes the single clutch idea a clumsy application.

Having owned a car using this aforementioned dual-clutch gearbox, I cannot help but feel smug every time the car upshifts seamlessly, offering the acceleration of a typical manual gearbox yet offering fast, fuss-free shifts of a torque converter automatic. For a gearbox with the least compromises, and offering the best of all worlds, this has got to be it.

But of course, the couple of compromises this gearbox makes might be worth mentioning here, as they are significant depending on what the driver is looking for in a drive.

No matter how smooth dual-clutch gearbox shifts, it still suffers some symptoms of a semi-automatic. For instance, moving off on an incline, roll-back is bound to happen – hence the need for a hill-hold function. Applying especially to luxury cars, some vibration is also experienced when the clutch engages as the car is about to move off. The loss of some refinement here might be crucial for those looking for an absolutely smooth, fluid gearbox. A torque converter automatic on the other hand, still triumphs as probably the smoothest gearbox around. For that reason, I predict its application would still come in useful in the most luxurious of cars.

The dual-clutch gearbox offers seamless upshifts – yes. But what about downshifts, one might wonder? One common complaint about this gearbox is about its slow downshifts. While particular attention is paid to the speed of the gearbox upshifting, the downshifting, especially crucial if one were to drive on a track, is less than satisfactory in some versions of this gearbox. Newer versions, like BMW’s DCT, might solve this issue somewhat by allowing the driver to set the speed of the shifts. However, the award for the ‘sportiest’ fuss-free gearbox – one which a person would love to use on a track – would probably be the single-clutch semi-automatic manual, especially those perfected like in the F430 Scuderia.

Here is the strong suit of the manual gearbox – the one with the clutch and the stick is probably still the one which connects the driver to the car the most. Every upshift or downshift is entirely decided by the driver; whether you decide to half-clutch, heel and toe, coasting the car in neutral at a traffic light junction, rev the heck out of the car at its sweet spot, or short-shift to save petrol, the car won’t stop you from doing anything. Also, unlike some gearboxes which may have a torque limit, above which the gearbox may blow, a manual works with any power you can give it. Offering the most control, this gearbox would probably be my personal choice. Nowadays, it is an uncommon choice but one likely to have its fair share of fans; an evergreen.

Hence, there is no perfect answer to the question of whether dual-clutch gearboxes are the future. It does however, take over and overlaps the functions of many current gearboxes, which would make it an immensely popular choice with both car manufacturers and drivers alike. Other gearboxes mentioned above would have their own niches in the market, which makes us consumers spoilt for choice more than ever before.

COPYRIGHT Full Metal Autos – All Rights Reserved

automatic transmissionCVTdual-clutch gearbox is transmission of the futuredual-clutch transmissionFerrari F430Gallardomanual gearboxmanual transmission
Achieva SCX

Neo-Classic Car: 1993 Oldsmobile Achieva SCX

16 Feb, 09

Rare Vehicle Sighting: 1996 Volkswagen Golf...

16 Feb, 09

Related Posts

Long Term Tests

Long Term Wrap-Up: 2013 Toyota Sienna XLE AWD

GM Cruise
News

Honda Will Invest $2.75B in GM’s Cruise...

Rotary Engine
News

Mazda is Bringing Back the Rotary Engine

Chris Haak
Chris is FMA's Founder and Editor-in-Chief. He has a lifelong love of everything automotive, having grown up as the son of a car dealer. Chris spent the past decade writing for, managing, and eventually owning Autosavant before selling the site to pursue other interests. A married father of two sons, Chris is also in the process of indoctrinating them into the world of cars and trucks.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Recent Posts

  • Long Term Wrap-Up: 2013 Toyota Sienna XLE AWD
  • Honda Will Invest $2.75B in GM’s Cruise Autonomous-Vehicle Unit
  • Mazda is Bringing Back the Rotary Engine
  • Goodbye, NAFTA. Hello NAFTA 2.0 (USMCA)
  • I May Have Been the First to Put BF Goodrich KO2s on an Audi Q5

Recent Comments

  • Jon on I May Have Been the First to Put BF Goodrich KO2s on an Audi Q5
  • chrisadm on I May Have Been the First to Put BF Goodrich KO2s on an Audi Q5
  • Christopher Smith on I May Have Been the First to Put BF Goodrich KO2s on an Audi Q5
  • Christopher Smith on I May Have Been the First to Put BF Goodrich KO2s on an Audi Q5
  • Chris Haak on I May Have Been the First to Put BF Goodrich KO2s on an Audi Q5

Advert

Instagram

Archives

  • March 2020
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • April 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007

  • Home
  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy