• Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • News
  • Reviews
  • Features
  • Editorials
  • Long Term Tests
  • Video

NHTSA Improves Crash-Test Program For 2010

Chris Haak/10 Jul, 08/699/0
News

By Chris Haak

07.10.2008

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) announced this week that it is significantly changing the way that it crash-tests new vehicles and reports on those results to consumers. This is the first major change in the crash-test regime since the star system was developed in 1979.

One motivator behind the NHTSA’s decision to revamp the rating system is that 96% of all new cars sold today receive four or five star safety ratings. In 1979, when the star rating system was introduced, only about 30% of all new vehicles were rated at four or five stars. Not only have cars literally become much safer places to be in the event of a collision, but manufacturers have become experts at building cars that are able to ace the tests, even if other crash tests such as the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS) 40 mile per hour offset barrier test is much tougher to pass than the government-mandated tests. Basically, acing the government’s tests did not necessarily mean that you were driving a car that would do the best job of protecting its occupants in different types of crashes.

The new crash test program, which takes effect for the 2010 model year, will add a side impact crash into a pole which is intended to simulate wrapping a car around a tree, as well as additional front end tests and using a small female dummy for some tests, since accident results have shown that females of small stature are most at risk of current restraint system designs not adequately protecting them. Additionally, the new system will provide concise information to consumers about the various safety technologies included in a given vehicle, such as stability control, lane departure warning systems, etc.

Although the tests themselves are more comprehensive and therefore more difficult to master for automobile manufacturers, they will provide consumers with a single overall star rating rather than driver, passenger, driver side impact, passenger side impact, and rollover as the current ratings illustrate (and consumers have found to be confusing).

While saving lives is obviously an admirable goal, it’s also important to note that more rigorous safety standards also will likely further increase the weight of new vehicles, increase the cost, or both. Increasing the weight would then, of course, run contrary to the desire of all manufacturers to squeeze as much fuel economy out of their lineups to meet increasing CAFE standards over the next few years. Everything in automotive engineering is a balancing act, so this will require additional efforts and creativity on the part of everyone responsible for engineering new vehicles and making them both crash-worthy and fuel efficient.

COPYRIGHT Full Metal Autos – All Rights Reserved

NHRA’s Quarter Mile is Now 1,000 Feet...

10 Jul, 08

Toyota Significantly Changes US Production Plans

10 Jul, 08

Related Posts

Long Term Tests

Long Term Wrap-Up: 2013 Toyota Sienna XLE AWD

GM Cruise
News

Honda Will Invest $2.75B in GM’s Cruise...

Rotary Engine
News

Mazda is Bringing Back the Rotary Engine

Chris Haak
Chris is FMA's Founder and Editor-in-Chief. He has a lifelong love of everything automotive, having grown up as the son of a car dealer. Chris spent the past decade writing for, managing, and eventually owning Autosavant before selling the site to pursue other interests. A married father of two sons, Chris is also in the process of indoctrinating them into the world of cars and trucks.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Recent Posts

  • Long Term Wrap-Up: 2013 Toyota Sienna XLE AWD
  • Honda Will Invest $2.75B in GM’s Cruise Autonomous-Vehicle Unit
  • Mazda is Bringing Back the Rotary Engine
  • Goodbye, NAFTA. Hello NAFTA 2.0 (USMCA)
  • I May Have Been the First to Put BF Goodrich KO2s on an Audi Q5

Recent Comments

  • Jon on I May Have Been the First to Put BF Goodrich KO2s on an Audi Q5
  • chrisadm on I May Have Been the First to Put BF Goodrich KO2s on an Audi Q5
  • Christopher Smith on I May Have Been the First to Put BF Goodrich KO2s on an Audi Q5
  • Christopher Smith on I May Have Been the First to Put BF Goodrich KO2s on an Audi Q5
  • Chris Haak on I May Have Been the First to Put BF Goodrich KO2s on an Audi Q5

Advert

Instagram

Archives

  • March 2020
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • April 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007

  • Home
  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy