• Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • News
  • Reviews
  • Features
  • Editorials
  • Long Term Tests
  • Video

Is China an Opportunity – Or a Threat?

Chris Haak/26 Apr, 07/1156/0
Editorials
Is the short-term gain worth the possible long-term pain?

By Chris Haak

04.25.2007

Nearly all of the major players in the global auto industry – GM, Ford, Volkswagen, Toyota, Honda, etc. – have a significant presence in China. Why wouldn’t they, after all? It’s a big market now, and a huge potential market that will only grow at a torrid pace over the next several years. Companies like GM and Ford who are seeing double-digit sales declines in their home market are seeing their sales in China growing at 20-30% per year. That’s good, right?

Well, I’m not so sure. Of course, these sales are providing necessary sales volume and cash to keep the companies afloat during difficult times at home. But, typical of the usual practices in this industry, I fear that they have taken too shortsighted of an approach. As the old idiom says they’re being, “penny wise, pound foolish.” Or, more specifically, they are sacrificing their long-term competitive position both in China and worldwide for the sake of a few years of breakneck sales increases.

The reason is that the Chinese government mandates that all foreign auto companies partner with a local firm in order to manufacture sell their vehicles in China. China has not made its motivation for this policy a secret – it wants to develop a globally competitive auto industry. For an example of how it works, GM has a joint venture with SAIC (Shanghai Automotive Industrial Corp). In the initial part of the venture, GM brings modern engineering, design, and manufacturing processes to SAIC in return for market access and factory capacity. However, SAIC gains more expertise from GM, SAIC becomes a direct competitor to GM in the Chinese market. SAIC is in the process of rolling out models that compete directly with SAIC GM products.

The next logical step is for Chinese auto manufacturers to compete with the GMs and VWs of the world on a more global stage; perhaps in other developing markets such as Southeast Asia or India first. Meanwhile, GM’s sales growth in China will slow, eventually level off, and possibly decline as the domestic industry, favored by government policies, picks up the ball and runs with it. The end game is that the very companies that Western auto manufacturers taught how to build quality cars will be taking away their sales around the world in the next few decades.

The elephant in the room in all of this also is China’s utter contempt for intellectual property rights. If it weren’t so sad and egregious, it would be funny to point out the way Chinese companies blatantly copy products of other manufacturers and sell them at a discount. We’ve seen knockoffs of the Mercedes C-Class, Honda CR-V, Chevy Colorado and more, but my new personal favorite, courtesy of Winding Road, is the Huanghai Auto NCV. This crossover was recently shown at the Shanghai Auto Show, and it is an almost identical copy of a Pontiac Torrent from the windshield forward, and a Lexus RX350 on the rest of the vehicle. The fact that such an obvious rip-off could be displayed at a major international auto show without consequence just proves how lightly the Chinese take intellectual property rights. Don’t take my word for it, though – see for yourself.

2006 Pontiac Torrent and the 2007 Huanghai Auto NCV (front)
It’s bad enough that the Chinese have dictated the conditions under which their auto industry is opened, while they will enjoy nearly unfettered access to the home markets of these automakers in the coming years. But when that is compounded with blatant intellectual property violations, neither the country nor its industry has any credibility to me. Meanwhile, Western auto companies continue to help Chinese firms who will eventually steal sales from them. Are they making deals with the devil? Perhaps.
2006 Lexus RX 330 and the 2007 Huanghai Auto NCV (rear)

COPYRIGHT Full Metal Autos – All Rights Reserved

Buick in ChinaChina goes to school on American automakersChina has no design expertise currentlyChina has no respect for intellectual property rightsChina has no respect for patentsChinese partners of American automakersSAIC and GM in ChinaSAIC production in Chinatrusting Chinawill Chinese soon be selling cars in the US

Hyundai Needs Its Own Design Language

26 Apr, 07

Renault Logan: How to Build a Successful Cheap

26 Apr, 07

Related Posts

Long Term Tests

Long Term Wrap-Up: 2013 Toyota Sienna XLE AWD

GM Cruise
News

Honda Will Invest $2.75B in GM’s Cruise...

Rotary Engine
News

Mazda is Bringing Back the Rotary Engine

Chris Haak
Chris is FMA's Founder and Editor-in-Chief. He has a lifelong love of everything automotive, having grown up as the son of a car dealer. Chris spent the past decade writing for, managing, and eventually owning Autosavant before selling the site to pursue other interests. A married father of two sons, Chris is also in the process of indoctrinating them into the world of cars and trucks.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Recent Posts

  • Long Term Wrap-Up: 2013 Toyota Sienna XLE AWD
  • Honda Will Invest $2.75B in GM’s Cruise Autonomous-Vehicle Unit
  • Mazda is Bringing Back the Rotary Engine
  • Goodbye, NAFTA. Hello NAFTA 2.0 (USMCA)
  • I May Have Been the First to Put BF Goodrich KO2s on an Audi Q5

Recent Comments

  • Jon on I May Have Been the First to Put BF Goodrich KO2s on an Audi Q5
  • chrisadm on I May Have Been the First to Put BF Goodrich KO2s on an Audi Q5
  • Christopher Smith on I May Have Been the First to Put BF Goodrich KO2s on an Audi Q5
  • Christopher Smith on I May Have Been the First to Put BF Goodrich KO2s on an Audi Q5
  • Chris Haak on I May Have Been the First to Put BF Goodrich KO2s on an Audi Q5

Advert

Instagram

Archives

  • March 2020
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • April 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007

  • Home
  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy