• Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • News
  • Reviews
  • Features
  • Editorials
  • Long Term Tests
  • Video

Opel’s Fate May Not be Decided Today

Chris Haak/08 Sep, 09/903/0
News

By Chris Haak

09.08.2009

opel-logoThe fate of GM’s Adam Opel GmbH European subsidiary may be decided either today or tomorrow during GM’s scheduled two-day meeting of its board of directors – but a decision in that timeframe seems to be increasingly unlikely.

As followers of this continually-evolving situation may recall, GM transferred Opel’s and Vauxhall’s assets to a separate company controlled by a trust.  The trust was 35% controlled by General Motors, 10% by Opel employees, and 55% by the German government.  In February 2009, GM came to a tentative agreement to sell a controlling stake in Opel and Vauxhall to a Russian -backed consortium led by tier-one supplier Magna International, Inc.  The German government agreed to provide financial assistance for the deal with Magna (because Magna was likely to retain most of Opel’s German employees), but as always, the devil is in the details.

GM later re-opened the bidding process, which resulted in three preferred bidders:  Magna, Belgian investment firm RHJ, and China’s Beijing Automotive Industries.  Germany cried foul, stating its preference that the deal with Magna proceed and refusing to finance another transaction.  Beijing Automotive Industries’ offer was later not accepted because of intellectual property issues, and many similar issues are sprouting up as GM reconsiders Magna’s offer.

Last month, GM’s management presented a proposal to its newly-reconstituted (and apparently newly-assertive) board of directors to sell Opel and Vauxhall to Magna.  In a surprise twist that almost never would have occurred with the old GM, the board delayed a decision on Opel’s fate, and instructed management to go back to the drawing board, and to also consider raising the financing to just keep Opel.

Aside from egos and politics in fierce competition here (Germany’s elections occur on September 27 – I’ve never in my life known more than a month in advance when another country’s elections would be held before this time), there are hugely different competing priorities at play.  Germany – and its government, which is up for re-election – wants to preserve as many German jobs as possible.  Magna (and its automaker partner, Russia’s GAZ) wants access to Opel’s very good platforms and valuable intellectual property.  GM rightfully wants to maintain a significant presence in Europe (should it continue to aspire to be a global automaker) and most importantly, to retain undisputed rights to its intellectual property.  GM is trying to sell Chevrolet-badged cars in Russia, and literally could find itself in competition with its former subsidiary in Russia, should that technology transfer to GAZ.

Pesrsonally, I’d love to see GM come up with a way to keep Opel.  Many of its current and near-term vehicles are underpinned by platforms developed by Opel’s engineering in Rüsselsheim, Germany (such as the Chevrolet Cruze, Chevrolet Volt, Buick LaCrosse, Buick Regal, Chevrolet Orlando, and others).  Losing Opel and its engineering talent would be a big blow to GM’s aspirations to build excellent midsize cars in the future; its small car engineering abilities in Asia hasn’t exactly been instilling a lot of confidence with me after duds like the Chevrolet Aveo and other Daewoo-engineered flops.

Nobody knows what will happen in this situation, but if I had to place a bet, I’d bet that after the German elections, GM will mortgage its Asia-Pacific (China) operations in a bid to save Opel, the other countries in which GM has Opel operations (Spain, Poland, Belgium) will chip in a billion or two USD, Opel’s German workers will moan and complain about not wanting to return to the US-based corporate mothership, and Opel will continue to roll out excellent new vehicles like the Opel Insignia and forthcoming Opel Astra.

Meanwhile, the hands-on assertiveness of GM’s board (formerly known in some circles as the “board of bystanders”) and the accountability that it expects of management is a breath of fresh air.  Management by fear may not be a good tactic, but installing accountabilty and high expectations certainly is.

COPYRIGHT Full Metal Autos – All Rights Reserved

GM doesn't want to compete against itself in RussiaGM may not want to sell OpelOpel decision delayed againOpel GmbHOpel sale held up by intellectual property issues

Ford Ditches Navistar for 2011 Super Duty’s...

08 Sep, 09

Dueling Supercars: Mercedes-Benz SLS AMG and...

08 Sep, 09

Related Posts

Long Term Tests

Long Term Wrap-Up: 2013 Toyota Sienna XLE AWD

GM Cruise
News

Honda Will Invest $2.75B in GM’s Cruise...

Rotary Engine
News

Mazda is Bringing Back the Rotary Engine

Chris Haak
Chris is FMA's Founder and Editor-in-Chief. He has a lifelong love of everything automotive, having grown up as the son of a car dealer. Chris spent the past decade writing for, managing, and eventually owning Autosavant before selling the site to pursue other interests. A married father of two sons, Chris is also in the process of indoctrinating them into the world of cars and trucks.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Recent Posts

  • Long Term Wrap-Up: 2013 Toyota Sienna XLE AWD
  • Honda Will Invest $2.75B in GM’s Cruise Autonomous-Vehicle Unit
  • Mazda is Bringing Back the Rotary Engine
  • Goodbye, NAFTA. Hello NAFTA 2.0 (USMCA)
  • I May Have Been the First to Put BF Goodrich KO2s on an Audi Q5

Recent Comments

  • Jon on I May Have Been the First to Put BF Goodrich KO2s on an Audi Q5
  • chrisadm on I May Have Been the First to Put BF Goodrich KO2s on an Audi Q5
  • Christopher Smith on I May Have Been the First to Put BF Goodrich KO2s on an Audi Q5
  • Christopher Smith on I May Have Been the First to Put BF Goodrich KO2s on an Audi Q5
  • Chris Haak on I May Have Been the First to Put BF Goodrich KO2s on an Audi Q5

Advert

Instagram

Archives

  • March 2020
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • April 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007

  • Home
  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy