• Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • News
  • Reviews
  • Features
  • Editorials
  • Long Term Tests
  • Video

GM May Have to Drop GMC Brand

Chris Haak/16 Apr, 09/1057/0
News

By Chris Haak

04.16.2009

gmc_logoBloomberg reported today that GM’s GMC brand, which sells trucks and crossovers, may be on the chopping block, along with the previously-confirmed-to-be-on-death-row Hummer, Saturn, and Saab.  GM’s most recent restructuring plan called for a focus on Chevrolet, Cadillac, and Buick as “core brands,” with GMC and Pontiac to be retained, but Pontiac becoming a “niche brand” with only a couple of models.

GMC is GM’s second bestselling brand, behind Chevrolet (albeit a distant second, with just 20% of Chevrolet’s sales).  In 2008, GM’s divisional sales played out like this:

Buick:  137,197
Cadillac:  161,159
Chevrolet:  1,790,519
     Chevrolet trucks:  979,286
     Chevrolet cars:  811,233
GMC trucks:  361,739
Hummer:  27,485
Pontiac:  246,659
Saab:  21,368
Saturn:  188,004

TOTAL:  2,914,819

It’s easy to see why it makes sense to kill Hummer and Saab (48,853 sales combined, while Chevrolet sold 54,058 Suburbans alone).  Cutting their losses on Saturn also makes sense, because that’s the third-smallest sales volume in the lineup and has nearly all standalone dealers and a more flexible franchise agreement that makes it easier to terminate the brand.  On top of that, Saturn has zero completely unique products.  Every product that Saturn sells is available elsewhere at another GM brand:

Saturn Astra = Chevrolet Cobalt, Pontiac G5
Saturn Aura = Chevrolet Malibu, Pontiac G6
Saturn Outlook = Buick Enclave, Chevrolet Traverse, GMC Acadia
Saturn Sky = Pontiac Solstice
Saturn Vue = Chevrolet Equinox, GMC Terrain

GMC’s lineup, of course, has similar overlap issues – but it’s no guarantee that buyers who prefer the GMC Sierra variant of the Silverado will automatically buy a Silverado.  Very few Oldsmobile buyers moved to Buick or Pontiac when Oldsmobile was closed in 2004; instead, they bought Toyotas (among other brands).

The obvious implication of this news is that, bankruptcy or not, GM will be significantly smaller next year than it was in 2008 or 2009.  Taking away the sales of GMC, Pontiac, Saturn, Saab, and Hummer hacks off 865,944 units from GM’s 2008 sales in one fell swoop.  Assuming that Chevrolet, Cadillac, and Buick sales volumes remain flat (they won’t), that leaves 2,088,875 units.  But since Chevrolet, Cadillac, and Buick sales are down 48.4% year to date, chop another 50% (roughly) off of the 2,088,875 number, and you’re close to a million units.

Pontiac has little reason to continue its existence, either.  Only the G8 and the Toyota-engineered Vibe not available elsewhere in the GM family, although Saturn’s impending demise leaves the Solstice as a slow-selling orphan that wouldn’t have made its second generation anyway.

In terms of plants, GM was already over capacity before the auto industry armageddon hit.  With the newly-slimmed company down to roughly a third of its 2008 sales volume potentially as early as 2010 (depending on the timing of a GMC/Pontiac closure/sale and the disposition of Hummer/Saab/Saturn), it’s not hard to see that thousands more people will lose their jobs.  If GM can shrink its capacity fast enough (frankly, with so many plants that are already under capacity losing many of the models that they build, I don’t see how it’s possible), GM would have eliminated nearly all of its overlapping models immediately.  However, it also would lose most of the ability to amortize development over multiple models that further platform sharing would do.  For example, if only Chevrolet and Cadillac are left standing, the Malibu is on its own platform, the Cobalt and HHR share a platform, the Cruze is on a new version of the Cobalt/HHR platform, the Camaro has its own platform, the Impala has its own platform, the Traverse has its own platform, etc.

Without GMC’s and Pontiac’s volume, I can’t see how GM will have enough cash flow to make its debt payments without either serious concessions from bondholders (which they are resisting right now) or Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection.

This should be an interesting 45 days.

COPYRIGHT Full Metal Autos – All Rights Reserved

damaged brandsdepressionDesperate GM will get rid of several brands shortlyGM bankruptcyGM will get much smallerGM will get rid of brands in order to get government moGMC may be a dead brandrecession

2011 Jeep Grand Cherokee is First to Get...

16 Apr, 09

Nardelli Tells Chrysler Employees They’re...

16 Apr, 09

Related Posts

Long Term Tests

Long Term Wrap-Up: 2013 Toyota Sienna XLE AWD

GM Cruise
News

Honda Will Invest $2.75B in GM’s Cruise...

Rotary Engine
News

Mazda is Bringing Back the Rotary Engine

Chris Haak
Chris is FMA's Founder and Editor-in-Chief. He has a lifelong love of everything automotive, having grown up as the son of a car dealer. Chris spent the past decade writing for, managing, and eventually owning Autosavant before selling the site to pursue other interests. A married father of two sons, Chris is also in the process of indoctrinating them into the world of cars and trucks.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Recent Posts

  • Long Term Wrap-Up: 2013 Toyota Sienna XLE AWD
  • Honda Will Invest $2.75B in GM’s Cruise Autonomous-Vehicle Unit
  • Mazda is Bringing Back the Rotary Engine
  • Goodbye, NAFTA. Hello NAFTA 2.0 (USMCA)
  • I May Have Been the First to Put BF Goodrich KO2s on an Audi Q5

Recent Comments

  • Jon on I May Have Been the First to Put BF Goodrich KO2s on an Audi Q5
  • chrisadm on I May Have Been the First to Put BF Goodrich KO2s on an Audi Q5
  • Christopher Smith on I May Have Been the First to Put BF Goodrich KO2s on an Audi Q5
  • Christopher Smith on I May Have Been the First to Put BF Goodrich KO2s on an Audi Q5
  • Chris Haak on I May Have Been the First to Put BF Goodrich KO2s on an Audi Q5

Advert

Instagram

Archives

  • March 2020
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • April 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007

  • Home
  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy