• Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • News
  • Reviews
  • Features
  • Editorials
  • Long Term Tests
  • Video

Auditors Raise Doubts on GM’s Ability to Survive

Chris Haak/05 Mar, 09/829/0
News

By Chris Haak

03.05.2009

deloitteWe mentioned just last week in our “Check Your Mirrors” news summary that GM’s auditors, Deloitte & Touche, were likely to slap the company with a statement that raised doubts about the company’s ability to continue as a going concern.

Today, GM filed its 10K with the SEC, and indeed, that statement is in there.  It reads, in part:

There is substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern.

Our independent public accounting firm has issued an opinion on our consolidated financial statements that states that the consolidated financial statements were prepared assuming we will continue as a going concern and further states that our recurring losses from operations, stockholders’ deficit and inability to generate sufficient cash flow to meet our obligations and sustain our operations raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. Our plans concerning these matters, including our Viability Plan, are discussed in Note 2 to the accompanying audited consolidated financial statements. Our future is dependent on our ability to execute our Viability Plan successfully or otherwise address these matters. If we fail to do so for any reason, we would not be able to continue as a going concern and could potentially be forced to seek relief through a filing under the U.S. Bankruptcy Code.

Doesn’t sound good, does it?  There’s more with the next paragraph in the 10K; all of this is found in the “Risks Related to us and our Automotive Businesses” section of the 10K, on page 20 of the document.

Our business, the success of our Viability Plan and our ability to continue as a going concern are highly dependent on sales volume. In 2008, global vehicle sales declined rapidly and there is no assurance that the global automobile market will recover or that it will not suffer a significant further downturn.

Our business and financial results are highly sensitive to sales volume, as demonstrated by the effect of sharp declines in vehicle sales in the United States since 2007 and globally during 2008. Vehicle sales in the United States have fallen 40% since their peak in 2007, and sales globally have declined 23.5% since their peak in January 2008. The deteriorating economic and market conditions that have driven the drop in vehicle sales, including declines in real estate values and household incomes, rising unemployment, tightened credit markets, weakened consumer confidence and volatility in oil prices, are not likely to improve during 2009 and may continue past that year. Our Viability Plan is based on assumptions that vehicle sales will decline further in 2009 but that they will begin to recover in 2010. Sales volumes may decline more severely or take longer to recover than we expect, however, and if they do, our results of operations and financial condition and the success of the Viability Plan will be materially adversely affected.

Part of the reason for this disclosure is for D&T to cover their butts from investor lawsuits in a post-Enron world (investors could likely successfully sue the auditors if they didn’t raise concerns about GM’s viability) and part of the reason for the disclosure is that GM is really, REALLY hurting.  In spite of all the restructuring work that GM is undertaking, it’s not happening fast enough.  Yesterday when I analyzed the February 2009 sales results, I pointed out several models with monthly sales in the mid-three digit range.  GM should be killing those models immediately.

The impact of this “going concern” statement goes much further than optics and perception.  GM has certain agreements in place with its creditors that require immediate repayment of outstanding debt if the company’s auditors raise concerns about GM’s ability to continue operations.  According to today’s Wall Street Journal, GM has obtained waivers from these creditors, so in the short term is safe from that standpoint.  However, GM also must be a “viable” company in the eyes of the Federal government in order to meet the terms of the bridge loans granted beginning in December 2008.  If the government decides that GM’s viability plan is not viable, the loans could be called, which would force GM into bankruptcy.

The “going concern” worries from GM will trickle down into its supplier base.  If GM is not likely to remain viable, that brings the health of its suppliers into question as well, so many of GM’s suppliers (at least those that aren’t as well-diversified, and are also in poor financial health) will likely see “going concern” warnings affixed to their 10Ks by their outside auditors.

And so the auto industry depression continues.

COPYRIGHT Full Metal Autos – All Rights Reserved

10KbankruptcyChapter 11General Motorsgoing concern worriessupplier baseViability PlanWall Street Journal

February 2009 Sales Results Are In

05 Mar, 09

California May Agree To Withdraw Its Emissions...

05 Mar, 09

Related Posts

Long Term Tests

Long Term Wrap-Up: 2013 Toyota Sienna XLE AWD

GM Cruise
News

Honda Will Invest $2.75B in GM’s Cruise...

Rotary Engine
News

Mazda is Bringing Back the Rotary Engine

Chris Haak
Chris is FMA's Founder and Editor-in-Chief. He has a lifelong love of everything automotive, having grown up as the son of a car dealer. Chris spent the past decade writing for, managing, and eventually owning Autosavant before selling the site to pursue other interests. A married father of two sons, Chris is also in the process of indoctrinating them into the world of cars and trucks.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Recent Posts

  • Long Term Wrap-Up: 2013 Toyota Sienna XLE AWD
  • Honda Will Invest $2.75B in GM’s Cruise Autonomous-Vehicle Unit
  • Mazda is Bringing Back the Rotary Engine
  • Goodbye, NAFTA. Hello NAFTA 2.0 (USMCA)
  • I May Have Been the First to Put BF Goodrich KO2s on an Audi Q5

Recent Comments

  • Jon on I May Have Been the First to Put BF Goodrich KO2s on an Audi Q5
  • chrisadm on I May Have Been the First to Put BF Goodrich KO2s on an Audi Q5
  • Christopher Smith on I May Have Been the First to Put BF Goodrich KO2s on an Audi Q5
  • Christopher Smith on I May Have Been the First to Put BF Goodrich KO2s on an Audi Q5
  • Chris Haak on I May Have Been the First to Put BF Goodrich KO2s on an Audi Q5

Advert

Instagram

Archives

  • March 2020
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • April 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007

  • Home
  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy