• Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • News
  • Reviews
  • Features
  • Editorials
  • Long Term Tests
  • Video

Counterpoint: Chrysler’s Not Going Anywhere

Chris Haak/06 Mar, 07/1098/0
Editorials

The Internet – including automotive websites and message boards, financial newspapers, and more – has been buzzing for the past few weeks with speculation about what will happen to DaimlerChrysler’s Chrysler group. I have the advantage of three weeks of news and analysis before commenting on where I think everything will end up, but it’s still pretty much anybody’s guess. I don’t think even Dr. Z knows how this will play out. But my suspicion is that Chrysler’s not going anywhere.

The speculation all began on February 14, when DaimlerChrysler presented their 2006 results to investors, and had to explain how they were going to fix the $1.48 billion loss that the Chrysler group had in 2006. CEO Dieter Zetsche said that “all options are on the table” with regard to the Chrysler group’s future. In simple terms, this meant to most observers that any of several possible scenarios could happen:

  • Spinning the Chrysler group off of DaimlerChrysler as a separate company owned by DCX – or turning around and selling it to a private equity firm
  • Selling the Chrysler group to another automaker (GM later emerged as a front runner and has been one of the few to not deny interest)
  • Entering into strategic partnerships with other automakers

The situation appears to still be very much in flux, but at this point, I do not believe that GM or any other automaker will buy the Chrysler group. For GM, who already has too many divisions and too much product overlap (Pontiac G5, anyone?), adding three more to get eleven just makes their problems worse. Furthermore, adding Chrysler’s unfunded pension and retiree healthcare liabilities to GM’s own very substantial total would exacerbate that problem for GM as well. And how would GM pay whatever price DCX is asking for Chrysler? If you haven’t noticed, they have been selling stakes in car companies (Isuzu, Fuji Heavy Industries, Suzuki, and Fiat) and not buying them as they try to conserve cash to fund their restructuring. There would be further tens of thousands of jobs eliminated and a further loss of domestic market share as overlapping models were phased out.

Renault-Nissan actually sounds like a decent match on paper, but Carlos Ghosn and his team already have their hands full with a turnaround of Renault in Paris and is dealing with less-than-stellar Nissan results in the US for the past year. Plus, Renault-Nissan has publicly said that they are not interested, as have Hyundai and Volkswagen.

How about a Chinese manufacturer, using a purchase of Chrysler to get a foot in the US market, with an already-established dealer body, integrated production system, skilled workforce, substantial factory capacity, and a decent existing lineup? They certainly could afford it – but my guess is that Chinese manufacturers will tread more carefully into the US. I’ve read that at this time, they lack the necessary management talent to be players in the global automotive marketplace. Plus, they would probably experience a pretty substantial political backlash working against them

I could see Chrysler going to a private equity group. Cerberus Capital Management – recent purchasers of 51% of GMAC from General Motors – are rumored to have interest, and bids have been solicited from several other large players. According to both Detroit newspapers, both Cerberus and Blackstone Group are meeting with Chrysler to review its finances right now. I still don’t think that private equity is the most likely scenario, however.

Today, the thought occurred to me that all of the talk of selling Chrysler is just an elaborate attempt by Zetsche to gain a stronger hand in negotiations with the UAW later this year. He has made no secret of his disgust with the fact that the UAW granted healthcare cost concessions to Ford and GM, but not to Chrysler. Today, he said, “The union decided to treat Chrysler differently than GM or Ford, as far as health care was concerned, which was a disadvantage for Chrysler,” he said. “That was one fact we had to take into consideration in trying to understand the current situation and the potential options.” To me, that sure sounds like a man drawing a line in the sand, looking for a strong bargaining position.

Instead, the most likely scenario to me would be Chrysler completing its recently-announced restructuring plan under Tom LaSorda’s leadership. They’d hopefully be able to trim some structural costs while rolling out new models that are right for the US market in a time of high energy costs. I believe that we will see collaboration between Chrysler and GM on large SUVs – think of a rebadged Suburban, and possibly on the low end of the market as well, with Dodge selling rebadged Daewoos. Longer term, with the 25-year agreement just inked between Chrysler and Chery, we’ll probably see Chinese-built Dodges; however, Chrysler needs small car sales now, so rebadging Daewoos – which already meet US safety and emissions standards – from GM would probably be a faster solution than assisting Chery in the development of models suitable for the US.

I don’t think the Germans will get the price they want for Chrysler – analysts have pegged the value somewhere around $5 billion (excluding liabilities), which is about one-seventh of what Daimler-Benz paid for the company in 1998. Whatever happens, only one thing is certain…it’s going to be a bumpy ride for the next few months.

author says Chrysler isn't going anywhereChrysler will not go to GMChrysler will not merge with Renault-NissanGermans will not get the price they want for Chryslerrumors of Chrysler sale just strengthen hand of Zetsche

Is an XM-Sirius Merger Good for Consumers?

06 Mar, 07

Related Posts

Long Term Tests

Long Term Wrap-Up: 2013 Toyota Sienna XLE AWD

GM Cruise
News

Honda Will Invest $2.75B in GM’s Cruise...

Rotary Engine
News

Mazda is Bringing Back the Rotary Engine

Chris Haak
Chris is FMA's Founder and Editor-in-Chief. He has a lifelong love of everything automotive, having grown up as the son of a car dealer. Chris spent the past decade writing for, managing, and eventually owning Autosavant before selling the site to pursue other interests. A married father of two sons, Chris is also in the process of indoctrinating them into the world of cars and trucks.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Recent Posts

  • Long Term Wrap-Up: 2013 Toyota Sienna XLE AWD
  • Honda Will Invest $2.75B in GM’s Cruise Autonomous-Vehicle Unit
  • Mazda is Bringing Back the Rotary Engine
  • Goodbye, NAFTA. Hello NAFTA 2.0 (USMCA)
  • I May Have Been the First to Put BF Goodrich KO2s on an Audi Q5

Recent Comments

  • Jon on I May Have Been the First to Put BF Goodrich KO2s on an Audi Q5
  • chrisadm on I May Have Been the First to Put BF Goodrich KO2s on an Audi Q5
  • Christopher Smith on I May Have Been the First to Put BF Goodrich KO2s on an Audi Q5
  • Christopher Smith on I May Have Been the First to Put BF Goodrich KO2s on an Audi Q5
  • Chris Haak on I May Have Been the First to Put BF Goodrich KO2s on an Audi Q5

Advert

Instagram

Archives

  • March 2020
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • April 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007

  • Home
  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy