• Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • News
  • Reviews
  • Features
  • Editorials
  • Long Term Tests
  • Video

Will Saturn Die Or Become a Purveyor of Other Companies’ Rebadges?

Chris Haak/20 Feb, 09/957/0
Editorials

By Chris Haak

02.20.2009

saturn-sky-redline-003_jpgWednesday night, GM’s Saturn division sent letters to approximately 1.5 million Saturn owners to alert them that even in the face of GM announcing that it would likely close down the Saturn brand, Saturn would not necessarily fade into the sunset in 2011 when the current models’ life cycles ended.  Somewhat surprising, however, was the concept that the letter put forth of Saturn continuing beyond 2011 by distributing vehicles built by either GM or other manufacturers.

Saturn Distribution Corporation, or SDC, already exists as a subsidiary of GM, and is the entity with which Saturn dealers have their franchise agreements.  Saturn General Manager Jill Lajdziak noted in the letter that any future Saturn vehicles – whether or not they were sourced from GM – would be “fuel efficient, safe, reliable, and affordable.”  GM has asked Saturn retailers to not make any decisions about their franchises for 60 days to allow the company adequate time to study the spinoff alternative.  A working group consisting of Saturn dealers, GM employees, and independent consultants is conducting the due diligence to determine what would be needed in order to spin off Saturn.

A spinoff of the Saturn brand would have several advantages to General Motors.  First, GM won’t incur the the prohibitively expensive costs of shuttering a division.  The cost of Oldsmobile’s demise in 2004 was estimated to be $2 billion (which sounds like chump change now, and in fact is the same amount that GM had to pay Fiat just to break up their joint venture a few years ag0).  With fewer Saturn franchises than there were Oldsmobile franchises, but another five years of inflation, it’s unclear how expensive shuttering Saturn would be.  Saturn showrooms are among the most modern in the GM universe, and are – according to the franchise agreement – required to be standalone stores.  That means a more difficult transition to a different brand, but a consistently good and well-regarded customer service experience if there could be a way to keep the stores open.

The second advantage to spinning off Saturn would be the potential for a cash infusion from the entity that is purchasing it.  Instead of paying $2 billion to make Saturn disappear forever, GM might be able to do the decent thing with its dealers and not forcing them to close, while still receiving some capital from the buyer.  (Of course, like the Chrysler-Fiat proposal, it’s also entirely possible that GM would have to give Saturn away for nothing).

Third, the spun-off Saturn would not eat into marketing or product development resources, since marketing would be handled by the new owners, and product development for Saturn at GM has been halted.  If the new potential owners of Saturn wanted new products, they’d need to find third-party partners (as Chrysler has done with Fiat) to rebadge their products and serve as only a distributor of other companies’ rebadged products.

Saturn’s biggest positive in this situation is its retailers; they have a well-deserved reputation for providing consistently outstanding customer service.  Any company, such as perhaps one based in China with designs on the US market,  and without any current distribution channel in the US would probably find a purchase of that portion of Saturn to be particularly attractive.

As I said a few days ago, I confessed that always find rebadged vehicles to be intriguing.  I have no clue who a  suddenly-independent automaker like Saturn might decide to turn to in order to get new products from after 2012.  Might it be Nissan, who has pulled back somewhat from their joint venture with Chrysler – at least temporarily?  Really, nearly any model – and indeed nearly any manufacturer – might be a potential Saturn rebadge distribution partner in 2012.

The big “if,” however, is whether GM is able to find an interested buyer for Saturn.  Saturn Distribution Company really is a perfect name, because it’s in the unenviable position of being a car company that has no ability whatsoever to make cars.  This is a terrible time to try to sell a damaged asset such as Saturn, but perhaps it might still have a chance if dealers can pool their resources together to buy SDC, or if a Chinese company with US market ambitions such as Chamco or Chery wants a quick entry into this auto market.  Actually, Fiat would have probably been better off buying Saturn just to get a distribution channel of clean, well-mannered, customer-centric dealerships.  Unfortunately, I don’t see this playing out to a happy ending for Saturn and GM.  My expectation – and I hope I’m wrong – is that GM will not be able to find any entity with sufficient interest in Saturn, and will end up having to pay big dollars to make Saturn go away.

COPYRIGHT Full Metal Autos – All Rights Reserved

GM's financial woesJill LajdziakrebadgesSaturnSaturn Distribution CorporationSaturn might be spun offSaturn might sell other manufacturers' vehiclesSDC

President Obama Instructs EPA to Review Decision...

20 Feb, 09

Study Says Buyers Cross Struggling GM, Chrysler...

20 Feb, 09

Related Posts

Long Term Tests

Long Term Wrap-Up: 2013 Toyota Sienna XLE AWD

GM Cruise
News

Honda Will Invest $2.75B in GM’s Cruise...

Rotary Engine
News

Mazda is Bringing Back the Rotary Engine

Chris Haak
Chris is FMA's Founder and Editor-in-Chief. He has a lifelong love of everything automotive, having grown up as the son of a car dealer. Chris spent the past decade writing for, managing, and eventually owning Autosavant before selling the site to pursue other interests. A married father of two sons, Chris is also in the process of indoctrinating them into the world of cars and trucks.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Recent Posts

  • Long Term Wrap-Up: 2013 Toyota Sienna XLE AWD
  • Honda Will Invest $2.75B in GM’s Cruise Autonomous-Vehicle Unit
  • Mazda is Bringing Back the Rotary Engine
  • Goodbye, NAFTA. Hello NAFTA 2.0 (USMCA)
  • I May Have Been the First to Put BF Goodrich KO2s on an Audi Q5

Recent Comments

  • Jon on I May Have Been the First to Put BF Goodrich KO2s on an Audi Q5
  • chrisadm on I May Have Been the First to Put BF Goodrich KO2s on an Audi Q5
  • Christopher Smith on I May Have Been the First to Put BF Goodrich KO2s on an Audi Q5
  • Christopher Smith on I May Have Been the First to Put BF Goodrich KO2s on an Audi Q5
  • Chris Haak on I May Have Been the First to Put BF Goodrich KO2s on an Audi Q5

Advert

Instagram

Archives

  • March 2020
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • April 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007

  • Home
  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy