• Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • News
  • Reviews
  • Features
  • Editorials
  • Long Term Tests
  • Video

Chrysler-Nissan Product Sharing Agreement is in Jeopardy

Chris Haak/13 Feb, 09/1150/0
News

Chrysler’s much-ballyhooed joint ventures with Nissan, whereby Chrysler would produce a rebodied version of its Dodge Ram pickup in what would become the next-generation Nissan Titan, and Nissan would produce two small car models for Chrysler to be badged as Chryslers or Dodges has hit a snag.  That snag is the global financial meltdown and the way it is having a significant adverse impact on the global automotive industry.  OEMs and suppliers across the globe are encountering enormous struggles regardless of their country of origin and the countries in which they market their vehicles.

Last year, you may recall, the companies actually had two different joint venture announcements.  The first one, from January 2008 and which still appears to be in force today, is that Nissan would produce a rebadged version of its Versa subcompact in Mexico for sale in South America as a Chrysler or Dodge.  The second, more extensive joint venture announcement occurred in April 2008, where Nissan would build an “already designed” small car in Japan for Chrysler – supposedly not a rebadge, but a platform sharing venture.  Many assumed this car to be the production version of the Dodge Hornet small car, but that was never confirmed by either company.  Chrysler, in turn, would then build Nissan Titans that were the same as the Dodge Ram under the skin at its Saltillo, Mexico plant for Nissan.  Chrysler was to pay Nissan for the small cars that Nissan built, and Nissan was to pay Chrysler for the pickups that it built.

With the dramatic shifts in consumer behavior, exchange rates, credit markets, and more, both companies have decided to go back to their respective drawing boards and examine their cost assumptions to determine whether the venture is financially viable in a new reality.  My first thought when I read this news was that the move might be related to the Chrysler’s pending tie-up with Italy’s Fiat; after all, with Chrysler getting access to all of Fiat’s car platforms, why would it need to lean on Nissan?  However, according to industry newspaper Automotive News, people at Chrysler familiar with the situation have said that the Nissan venture news is unrelated to the Fiat situation.

I’ve always been oddly fascinated by rebadged and rebodied vehicles (such as the Hyundai Accent sold by as the Dodge Attitude pictured above), so I was curious to see what Nissan’s designers would have been able to do with the Dodge Ram.  A lot depends upon whether the cab and doors would stay the same in the Titan as they are in the Ram; given the way the Ram’s front fenders continue into the doors, that seems unlikely, which would make it more likely that the Nissan would truly have a unique look.  You know, unlike the Suzuki Equator versus the Nissan Frontier pickups.  But now with this news, it’s quite possible that there will never be a Dodge-based Titan.  If that happens, since the Titan’s Tupelo, Mississiippi plant is already allocated to production of Nissan’s light commercial vehicles (ahem, full size vans), it may mean the end of the road for the Titan after its current life cycle ends.  Should Chrysler survive to the end of 2009 (with or without Fiat’s help, but certainly with the US government’s help), it still is unlikely to have credible small cars to sell even in 2010.  That part is not good news at all for the struggling company.

Dodge RamFiat-Chrysler allianceNissan FrontierNissan TitanNissan Versapickup trucksproduct sharingrebadgesSuzuki Equator

TrueDelta Releases Quarterly Reliability Results

13 Feb, 09

GM No Longer Considers Chapter 11 Filing Off The...

13 Feb, 09

Related Posts

Long Term Tests

Long Term Wrap-Up: 2013 Toyota Sienna XLE AWD

GM Cruise
News

Honda Will Invest $2.75B in GM’s Cruise...

Rotary Engine
News

Mazda is Bringing Back the Rotary Engine

Chris Haak
Chris is FMA's Founder and Editor-in-Chief. He has a lifelong love of everything automotive, having grown up as the son of a car dealer. Chris spent the past decade writing for, managing, and eventually owning Autosavant before selling the site to pursue other interests. A married father of two sons, Chris is also in the process of indoctrinating them into the world of cars and trucks.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Recent Posts

  • Long Term Wrap-Up: 2013 Toyota Sienna XLE AWD
  • Honda Will Invest $2.75B in GM’s Cruise Autonomous-Vehicle Unit
  • Mazda is Bringing Back the Rotary Engine
  • Goodbye, NAFTA. Hello NAFTA 2.0 (USMCA)
  • I May Have Been the First to Put BF Goodrich KO2s on an Audi Q5

Recent Comments

  • Jon on I May Have Been the First to Put BF Goodrich KO2s on an Audi Q5
  • chrisadm on I May Have Been the First to Put BF Goodrich KO2s on an Audi Q5
  • Christopher Smith on I May Have Been the First to Put BF Goodrich KO2s on an Audi Q5
  • Christopher Smith on I May Have Been the First to Put BF Goodrich KO2s on an Audi Q5
  • Chris Haak on I May Have Been the First to Put BF Goodrich KO2s on an Audi Q5

Advert

Instagram

Archives

  • March 2020
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • April 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007

  • Home
  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy