• Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • News
  • Reviews
  • Features
  • Editorials
  • Long Term Tests
  • Video

Infiniti Announces Idiotic New Naming Scheme

Chris Haak/17 Dec, 12/959/0
Editorials

Over the years, Infiniti’s management has made some head-scratching moves.  The brand, launched around the same time as Lexus, decided to show rocks and trees – and not the actual products – as it launched, which led potential buyers to wonder just what the heck Infiniti was.  Now, Infiniti has a decent – albeit not full – lineup consisting of the G and M cars, and EX, JX, FX, and QX crossovers, all with model names that describe their engine displacement, so it must be time to blow things up.

So that’s exactly what they are doing.  Gone are the names mentioned above.  Every car will be called “Qxx” where xx no longer indicates engine displacement (where 37 used to mean 3.7 liters, for instance) and the numbers will now explain their position in the lineup’s hierarchy.  Remember the M45/37?  That model is now the Q70.  The G37 coupe/convertible becomes the Q60, and what would have been the next-generation G25/37 will be called the Q50 when it makes its debut in Detroit in a few weeks.  So no, there won’t be a new Q45, and if there is in the future, it won’t be the Infiniti flagship.

On the crossover/SUV front, the QX56 becomes the QX80, with a new 8.0 liter engine.  (Just kidding.)  The FX37/50 becomes the QX70, the JX35 becomes the QX60, and the EX37 becomes the QX50.

It’s certainly a different idea than most of Infiniti’s competitors have chosen, where Lexus, BMW, and Mercedes-Benz more or less have model names that describe their engine displacement, or at least what their engines would displace if they were naturally aspirated and producing similar power figures.  But running through a few of Infiniti’s other competitors in my mind, it occurred to me that Volvo actually uses a similar scheme.  Volvo’s sedans all have “S” names, wagons have “V” names, and crossovers have “XC” names.  The accompanying numbers indicate their position in the model hierarchy, with higher numbers being “better” models.

But the thing is, Volvo worked their way into their naming scheme over years and with the transition – or at least mid-cycle enhancements – of their models.  Aside from the G replacement (called the Q50, of course), every vehicle in the lineup had a different name in 2013 than it its nearly-identical 2014 counterpart.  This will lead to buyer confusion, which will potentially lead to lost sales.

Why did they pick Q?  According to Johan de Nysschen, Infiniti’s Hong Kong-based worldwide president, consumer research in markets around the world found a favorable reaction to the letter Q as an automotive name. More specifically, in the United States, research found that consumers still see a strong association between the brand and the letter Q. Consumers in Europe associate the Q designation with “a high-performance car with subtle styling.”  Imagine – all of that from a single letter.  I think they may be paying their marketing consultants a bit too much to come up with this crap.

Of course, it’s entirely possible that I’m entirely wrong about this.  Maybe this is the right move for Infiniti.  But the cited rationale for the new name – to “reflect “Infiniti’s desire for clarity and cohesiveness as it embarks on ambitious growth plans, including significant expansion of the Infiniti portfolio” seems to be doing the opposite of improving clarity.  The JX was just launched in March 2012, and is selling well for Infiniti.  Now it will have a different name just as it’s getting good traction with buyers.

And the notion of the new names adding more space in the lineup for additional models?  Well, there’s obviously room numerically below the Q50.  There are the multiples of five in between the Q50, Q60, and Q70.  But wouldn’t it seem that this new naming scheme is more limiting than having an entire alphabet to play with?  There’s no Infiniti A, B, C, D, E, F…you get the idea.  If the car names all end in zero, they can add the Q10, Q20, Q30, and Q40 on the low end, and Q80 and Q90 on the high end.

We’ll see how the buying public feels about this naming convention change.  I suspect that the reaction that Infiniti got today was not exactly what they were hoping to see from the automotive media.

alphanumeric car namesAudicar namesInfinitinamesNissanVolvo

The Good, The Bad and the Ugly Of the 2012 Los...

17 Dec, 12

Are You Ready For a Self-Driving Car?

17 Dec, 12

Related Posts

Long Term Tests

Long Term Wrap-Up: 2013 Toyota Sienna XLE AWD

GM Cruise
News

Honda Will Invest $2.75B in GM’s Cruise...

Rotary Engine
News

Mazda is Bringing Back the Rotary Engine

Chris Haak
Chris is FMA's Founder and Editor-in-Chief. He has a lifelong love of everything automotive, having grown up as the son of a car dealer. Chris spent the past decade writing for, managing, and eventually owning Autosavant before selling the site to pursue other interests. A married father of two sons, Chris is also in the process of indoctrinating them into the world of cars and trucks.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Recent Posts

  • Long Term Wrap-Up: 2013 Toyota Sienna XLE AWD
  • Honda Will Invest $2.75B in GM’s Cruise Autonomous-Vehicle Unit
  • Mazda is Bringing Back the Rotary Engine
  • Goodbye, NAFTA. Hello NAFTA 2.0 (USMCA)
  • I May Have Been the First to Put BF Goodrich KO2s on an Audi Q5

Recent Comments

  • Jon on I May Have Been the First to Put BF Goodrich KO2s on an Audi Q5
  • chrisadm on I May Have Been the First to Put BF Goodrich KO2s on an Audi Q5
  • Christopher Smith on I May Have Been the First to Put BF Goodrich KO2s on an Audi Q5
  • Christopher Smith on I May Have Been the First to Put BF Goodrich KO2s on an Audi Q5
  • Chris Haak on I May Have Been the First to Put BF Goodrich KO2s on an Audi Q5

Advert

Instagram

Archives

  • March 2020
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • April 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007

  • Home
  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy