• Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • News
  • Reviews
  • Features
  • Editorials
  • Long Term Tests
  • Video

GM Has a Truck Inventory Problem

Chris Haak/06 Dec, 12/1011/0
News

The autoblogosphere is all atwitter today about GM’s truck inventory levels.  They’re ridiculously high, and the problem has gotten worse since last month rather than better.  More specifically, the company has 245,853 trucks as of the end of November, which is a 4.4 percent increase over the October 31 total – and represents a 139-day supply.  The industry considers 60 days of inventory to be ideal.  So how did this happen?

GM currently builds its trucks in three plants, and announced a year ago that it would keep cranking out trucks to keep sales flowing during the extensive downtime required to retool the plants for the new trucks – 21 weeks of downtime!  Unfortunately for GM, even though it wanted to build some extra trucks, it didn’t need nearly as many as it built.

Days’ supply is a pretty simple metric, and because it’s a ratio (it is just the number of trucks in inventory divided by the average daily sales), it can be improved from either of two directions:  increasing sales (demand) or decreasing inventory (supply).

GM’s current truck problem is caused by both supply and demand issues.  On the supply side, it built extra trucks to cover its needs during the plant retooling downtime.  On the demand side, GM’s incentives are reduced from 2011’s and aren’t as strong as what Chrysler is offering to RAM buyers.  Throw in the fact that most buyers know that an improved, all-new truck is coming in a few months, add a few “Government Motors” haters, and the fact that GM itself is not really growing as quickly as the market has been (so is losing the marketshare battle not long after leaving bankruptcy), and you can tell why buyers may not be lining up to buy these trucks.

Conspiracy theorists may suggest that GM front-loaded pickup production to improve its financial results in the first half of the year, since it books the revenue on a new vehicle in the U.S as soon as the vehicle leaves the factory.  Build more trucks (we’re not worried about selling them yet) and the money flows in.  Yet the company has to do something about the trucks that it already built.  Eventually the dealers’ lots get full of trucks and they still don’t sell.  GM claims that the incentives on the hood of the RAM caught them by surprise, and as a result, GM had many trucks that Rm buyers otherwise may have bought, but didn’t because Ram offered them a better deal.

GM will likely deal with this issue in two ways.  Expect production to slow down pretty dramatically over the next few months to more closely match supply.  Also, expect additional incentives on GM trucks.  The risk with incentives, of course, is that you’ll lower the value of your brand, conditioning buyers to not wait for the vehicle they want, but instead to buy only for the sake of the deal.  That, in turn, hurts residual values, which pisses off customers and makes leasing less financially viable.

When GM cuts production, its revenue will go down.  (Remember, it doesn’t have to actually sell a vehicle to book revenue, only to build and ship it).  Financial results in the fourth quarter of 2012 (and possibly the first quarter of 2013) will not look great.  Even worse, if GM slaps more incentives onto the hood of its trucks to clear out this giant inventory, that will hurt the company’s bottom line even more – not to mention the brand’s perception.

Finally, there’s GM’s larger problem:  in a recovering auto market where Ford sold 5.4% more cars in the first 11 months of 2012 over 2011 and Chrysler’s sales are up an impressive 22%, GM’s year to date sales increase is a much more modest 3.5%.  The overall new-car market in the U.S. is up 14% through 11 months, so GM is really lagging behind – and losing market share.  Besides GM’s overall market-share problem, the company is also falling behind specifically in full-size pickup sales.  Ford’s F-Series is up 11.6% through 11 months and the RAM is up 20.2%, while the GMC Sierra is up just 4.4% and the Chevrolet Silverado is up a measly 0.1%.  Combined, GM full-size truck sales are up just 1.2%.  With fresher choices from Ford and RAM (particularly the newly-freshened 2013 RAM, which just won the Motor Trend Truck of the Year award), look for GM to continue to lose share in the truck market, at least until the new truck comes out and the company can convince buyers it’s a better buy (either on features or in terms of value) than its competitors.

It will be interesting to see how this all plays out.

ChevroletGMGMCinventorypickup salessalesSierraSilverado

GM Ventures Invests In EV Transit Bus Startup

06 Dec, 12

2014 Chevrolet Silverado and GMC Sierra Pickups...

06 Dec, 12

Related Posts

Long Term Tests

Long Term Wrap-Up: 2013 Toyota Sienna XLE AWD

GM Cruise
News

Honda Will Invest $2.75B in GM’s Cruise...

Rotary Engine
News

Mazda is Bringing Back the Rotary Engine

Chris Haak
Chris is FMA's Founder and Editor-in-Chief. He has a lifelong love of everything automotive, having grown up as the son of a car dealer. Chris spent the past decade writing for, managing, and eventually owning Autosavant before selling the site to pursue other interests. A married father of two sons, Chris is also in the process of indoctrinating them into the world of cars and trucks.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Recent Posts

  • Long Term Wrap-Up: 2013 Toyota Sienna XLE AWD
  • Honda Will Invest $2.75B in GM’s Cruise Autonomous-Vehicle Unit
  • Mazda is Bringing Back the Rotary Engine
  • Goodbye, NAFTA. Hello NAFTA 2.0 (USMCA)
  • I May Have Been the First to Put BF Goodrich KO2s on an Audi Q5

Recent Comments

  • Jon on I May Have Been the First to Put BF Goodrich KO2s on an Audi Q5
  • chrisadm on I May Have Been the First to Put BF Goodrich KO2s on an Audi Q5
  • Christopher Smith on I May Have Been the First to Put BF Goodrich KO2s on an Audi Q5
  • Christopher Smith on I May Have Been the First to Put BF Goodrich KO2s on an Audi Q5
  • Chris Haak on I May Have Been the First to Put BF Goodrich KO2s on an Audi Q5

Advert

Instagram

Archives

  • March 2020
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • April 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007

  • Home
  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy