• Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • News
  • Reviews
  • Features
  • Editorials
  • Long Term Tests
  • Video

2013 Ram V6 Boasts Best-in-Class Fuel Efficiency

Chris Haak/24 Aug, 12/932/0
News

Move over, horsepower wars (or, for trucks, torque wars).  It’s now time for the fuel economy wars!

In all seriousness, we are probably at or near a peak in which future powertrain advances will be applied to keep power output reasonably steady while improving efficiency.  This is a major shift from the past three decades, where probably more than half of the advances in powertrains went to improving performance while keeping efficiency relatively flat.  With 250+ horsepower family cars now commonplace, do we really want to arm minimally-trained drivers with 300-horsepower cars?

This brings us to today’s news about the updated-for-2013 Ram pickup.  Though it’s just a mid-cycle refresh and not an entirely new model, there are some significant changes above and below the sheetmetal that warrant mentioning.

The big news is that with the new 3.6 liter Pentastar V6 and an 8-speed automatic, the Ram 1500 4×2 is rated at 18 mpg city/25 mpg highway.  That’s pretty great for a full-size pickup, V6 or not.  The 2012 Ram 1500 4×2 is rated at 14/20 city/highway (16 mpg combined), whether it has the base 3.7 liter V6, 4.7 liter V8, or 5.7 liter HEMI, so this represents a substantial improvement.

The Pentastar is more powerful and more efficient than the old 3.7 liter V6, and certainly the 8-speed automatic helps by keeping the truck in the right gear at all times (and allows the engine to lope along at highway speeds, likely a big part of that 25 mpg rating).  Additionally, the extra ratios will allow a very low first gear, which will help multiply the V6’s torque, and possibly allowing 2013 Ram buyers to consider the V6 when they may not have in the past.  The 3.6 liter V6 produces 305 horsepower and 269 lb-ft of torque.  Incidentally, the big 5.7 liter HEMI V8 will also get the 8-speed auto, while the 4.7 liter V8 soldiers on with a 6-speed unit.  The 8-speed automaticdoubles the number of gear ratios backing the Ram’s V6 compared to the 2012 truck’s antiquated 4-speed/3.7 liter team.

Chrysler engineers employed a number of other tricks to boost the Ram’s fuel economy.  These include optional air suspension that lowers the truck at highway speeds, a stop/start system, active grille shutters, improved aerodynamics, electric power steering, and even a system that pre-heats fluids to operating temperature more quickly.

Most of the interior remains intact, which isn’t necessarly a bad thing – the Ram has had a pretty decent interior (for a truck) since its most recent re-do when the current generation debuted for the 2009 model year.  However, there is an infotainment upgrade coming to the 2013s – a revised UConnect system will boast the same giant 8.4 inch central LCD display found in the Charger, 300, and Dart and has mobile hotspot capabilities (with the data coming from Sprint – for an additional monthly fee, naturally).

Ram seems to be taking sort of a middle ground with the evolution of its flagship pickup.  While Ford is going to focus big-time on fuel efficiency in its next-generation F-150 (including an aluminum-intensive construction), GM appears to be content with incremental improvements in its own next-generation Chevrolet Silverado and GMC Sierra, with powertrain improvements but no wholesale switch to lighter (and more expensive) materials.  Of note, the 2013 Ram’s hood is now made of aluminum, which represents a 26-pound weight reduction vs. the 2012 Ram’s steel hood.

With Ford’s new truck not due for more than a year, and GM’s not coming much before then, the 2013 model year may be an opportunity for Ram to take more marketshare from its rivals, at least in the short term.  After that, we’ll enjoy watching this battle.  Don’t expect Ford to be content with second place in the fuel efficiency race, particularly with its bestselling and expensive-to-develope next-generation F-150.

2013 RamChevrolet SilveradoDodge RamFord F-150GMC Sierrahalf ton pickupnew Rampickuppickup truck fuel economyRam

Detroit 3, CAW Prepare For Difficult Contract...

24 Aug, 12

Ford’s European Turnaround Based on Product...

24 Aug, 12

Related Posts

Long Term Tests

Long Term Wrap-Up: 2013 Toyota Sienna XLE AWD

GM Cruise
News

Honda Will Invest $2.75B in GM’s Cruise...

Rotary Engine
News

Mazda is Bringing Back the Rotary Engine

Chris Haak
Chris is FMA's Founder and Editor-in-Chief. He has a lifelong love of everything automotive, having grown up as the son of a car dealer. Chris spent the past decade writing for, managing, and eventually owning Autosavant before selling the site to pursue other interests. A married father of two sons, Chris is also in the process of indoctrinating them into the world of cars and trucks.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Recent Posts

  • Long Term Wrap-Up: 2013 Toyota Sienna XLE AWD
  • Honda Will Invest $2.75B in GM’s Cruise Autonomous-Vehicle Unit
  • Mazda is Bringing Back the Rotary Engine
  • Goodbye, NAFTA. Hello NAFTA 2.0 (USMCA)
  • I May Have Been the First to Put BF Goodrich KO2s on an Audi Q5

Recent Comments

  • Jon on I May Have Been the First to Put BF Goodrich KO2s on an Audi Q5
  • chrisadm on I May Have Been the First to Put BF Goodrich KO2s on an Audi Q5
  • Christopher Smith on I May Have Been the First to Put BF Goodrich KO2s on an Audi Q5
  • Christopher Smith on I May Have Been the First to Put BF Goodrich KO2s on an Audi Q5
  • Chris Haak on I May Have Been the First to Put BF Goodrich KO2s on an Audi Q5

Advert

Instagram

Archives

  • March 2020
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • April 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007

  • Home
  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy