• Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • News
  • Reviews
  • Features
  • Editorials
  • Long Term Tests
  • Video

Yesterday Was Not Back to the Future Day, But Let’s Look At Its Future Cars

Chris Haak/29 Jun, 12/971/0
Features

As you may have heard, June 27, 2012, was not the day that Doc Brown set the time machine in his DeLorean to go to in the future in Back to the Future, despite what the Internet wanted us to believe on Wednesday.  As an unabashed fan of the Back to the Future trilogy, at first I was mad at myself for missing such a momentous date; I kind of had an excuse in that I hadn’t watched the movies in a while.  But then I started to think about how neatly the four main time periods in the trilogy worked out and realized it was just a hoax.

Fans of the movie know that Doc Brown and Marty McFly met in 1985; Marty travels 30 years into the past (to 1955) to save Doc Brown from the Libyan terrorists.  At the end of the first movie, Doc tells Marty that they have to go into the future to do something about their kids, setting the stage for Back to the Future Part II.  The future to a 1985 Marty is 30 years hence, which is 2015, and not 2012.  Aside from 1985 +/- 30 years, there’s also the jumped-the-shark Back to the Future Part III that takes place in the old west in 1885, 100 years before the main then-present-day story line.

I thought it would be fun to use the timing of yesterday’s hoax to take a look at some of the “future” cars predicted in Back to the Future Part II to see how closely they matched reality, even if it’s only 27 years after 1985 rather than 30.  After all, the Hover Board became a reality (ish), so maybe we’ll see cars likeBack to the Future’s vision of 2015 fairly soon.

The only car that I remembered from the movie’s 2015 streets was a 1989-vintage Ford Probe.  At the time of its release for the 1989 model year, the Mazda-based would-be Mustang replacement had an incredibly futuristic (for the time) shape.  The prop folks at Universal Studios took a sleek car for the day and added some additional aerodynamic enhancements.  The “future” cars appear to adhere to one or more of the following rules:

  • Sleek-looking current (as of 1989) products with aero enhancements
  • Standard 1989-vintage cars with wacky paintjobs or stripe jobs
  • Standard 1989-vintage cars with wacky full wheel covers
  • Real concept cars a year or two removed from the auto show circuit
  • Pontiac was still alive and thriving

You may recall that cars could fly in Hill Valley 2015, yet aside from those few special-effects scenes, nearly every photo on the Back to the Future Part II IMCDB page shows the cars firmly planted on the earth.  Not every one, though, as this flying 1987 Jeep Wrangler would attest.

And now for some examples of cars that adhered to the five rules above.

Sleek-looking current (as of 1989) products with aero enhancements

 

These quite standard Probes with nothing other than an artificial windshield covering part of their hoods, custom wheel covers, and a “redesigned” C-pillar applique makes me laugh.  They gray one looks to me like a regular Probe with a hot water bottle on its head, or one that’s covered by a blanket.

Standard 1989-vintage cars with wacky paint jobs or stripe jobs

Check out the sporty, futuristic 1984-vintage Ford Tempo here.  Isn’t it fetching?

Standard 1989-vintage cars with wacky full wheel covers

Think those awful wheels are Trail Rated?  On a complete tangent, I never cared for the square-headlamped Wranglers.  They are just too 1980s and too far from the classic CJ look.

Real concept cars a year or two removed from the auto show circuit

What an eclectic mix of cars here; this Pontiac Pursuit (white car in the photo above) could almost pass for a modern concept car, except for the fact that Pontiac was shuttered two years ago.  The red car is the Pontiac Banshee concept from the 1980s.  So the filmmakers got their embrace of Pontiac completely wrong – there won’t be a downtown Hill Valley Pontiac dealer because there is no such thing as a new Pontiac anymore.

So what does this mean?  Predicting almost anything 30 years into the future is almost impossible.  And if you do so anyway, you’re likely to get it wrong, and people like me are already prepared to laugh at what you say instead of taking it seriously.

Thanks to the thoroughly-researched Internet Movie Car Database at IMCDB.org for filling in the many holes in my memory.

Back to the FutureBack to the Future HoaxFord Probefuturefuture carsmovie carsmovies

What Happened To The 1957 Plymouth Belvedere...

29 Jun, 12

Apple’s iPhone 5 Will Cause Headaches For...

29 Jun, 12

Related Posts

Long Term Tests

Long Term Wrap-Up: 2013 Toyota Sienna XLE AWD

GM Cruise
News

Honda Will Invest $2.75B in GM’s Cruise...

Rotary Engine
News

Mazda is Bringing Back the Rotary Engine

Chris Haak
Chris is FMA's Founder and Editor-in-Chief. He has a lifelong love of everything automotive, having grown up as the son of a car dealer. Chris spent the past decade writing for, managing, and eventually owning Autosavant before selling the site to pursue other interests. A married father of two sons, Chris is also in the process of indoctrinating them into the world of cars and trucks.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Recent Posts

  • Long Term Wrap-Up: 2013 Toyota Sienna XLE AWD
  • Honda Will Invest $2.75B in GM’s Cruise Autonomous-Vehicle Unit
  • Mazda is Bringing Back the Rotary Engine
  • Goodbye, NAFTA. Hello NAFTA 2.0 (USMCA)
  • I May Have Been the First to Put BF Goodrich KO2s on an Audi Q5

Recent Comments

  • Jon on I May Have Been the First to Put BF Goodrich KO2s on an Audi Q5
  • chrisadm on I May Have Been the First to Put BF Goodrich KO2s on an Audi Q5
  • Christopher Smith on I May Have Been the First to Put BF Goodrich KO2s on an Audi Q5
  • Christopher Smith on I May Have Been the First to Put BF Goodrich KO2s on an Audi Q5
  • Chris Haak on I May Have Been the First to Put BF Goodrich KO2s on an Audi Q5

Advert

Instagram

Archives

  • March 2020
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • April 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007

  • Home
  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy