• Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • News
  • Reviews
  • Features
  • Editorials
  • Long Term Tests
  • Video

Cars That Are Popular With Sub-Prime Buyers

Chris Haak/05 Jun, 12/939/0
News

There was an interesting article in today’s edition of Automotive News that explored part of the reason behind Chrysler’s dramatic sales rise over the past few months.  While industry-wide sales growth in the US has been around 10 percent, Chrysler is growing far more rapidly around a 30 percent clip.  The rub:  Chrysler appears to be catering to sub-prime auto buyers more than most other manufacturers.

We have all seen that one of the main causes of the recession of 2008/2009 was the explosion of sub-prime lending for homes, and those armies of unqualified home buyers defaulting on their mortgages.  In the wake of that, when lenders panicked about the creditworthiness of their loan customers, they cut off the spigot of sub-prime loans.  This, in turn, caused auto-sales to shrivel up as masses of potential buyers were suddenly deemed to be unqualified for loans.

Fast forward to 2012, and sub-prime lending is back, perhaps to levels not seen since the heyday of 2007.  According to data reviewed by Edmunds.com (we can’t find the direct link to it), sub-prime lending’s comeback is what is fueling Chrysler’s current streak of 26 months of consecutive sales gains.  Their data shows that 29 percent of all Chrysler new-vehicle loans were to customers with FICO scores of 680 or less.  (The definition of a ‘subprime borrower’ appears to vary between scores of 640 and 680, but is more precisely an individual who does not qualify for prime-rate lending, whatever their score is.)

The peril of such a strategy is that past credit problems are quite likely a good indicator of future credit problems.  To mitigate this risk, sub-prime borrowers often must pay much higher interest rates than prime borrowers have to.  Typically sub-prime auto loans’ interest rates exceed 10 percent.

When Edmunds looked at which models have the largest percentage of their loans with interest rates exceeding 10 percent, the list of cars was practically a who’s who of cheap new cars that seem to be more popular with poor people those of a lower socioeconomic stature (no offense meant to those who own the cars on the list, of course).  The stats:

Mitsubishi Galant, 43%
Suzuki SX4, 41%
Dodge Avenger, 39%
Kia Forte, 37%
Dodge Caliber, 36%
Nissan Sentra, 26%
Chrysler 200, 24%
Dodge Journey, 21%
Nissan Versa, 21%
Chevrolet Sonic, 20%

What’s common about these cars?  None are aspirational, and most would require a sheepish word of explanation/apology to coworkers or friends when you told them you bought one of them new.  “Why the hell did you buy a Dodge Caliber?”  “I couldn’t get a loan for anything else, man!”

The industry average pre-recession was that 27% of new-car loans were sub-prime.  In the depths of the recession, that fell to 18%, and is now 23%.  Chrysler’s data, however, showed that it was 30% pre-recession, 16% during recession, and 29% today.

Funny enough, another auto industry success story is also being fueled in part by sub-prime borrowing:  Hyundai-Kia, where 31% of loans currently carry interest rates over 10%.  That number is higher than Chrysler’s, of course, so either Kia is selling a zillion Fortes (it’s not) to pull the overall sub-prime number up, or Hyundai is also offering more generous lending terms to its sub-prime borrowers to keep the rest of their cars out of the 10% plus club.

There are a few lessons to be taken from this, kids.  First, manage your credit prudently so you don’t have to pay over 10% on your car loan.  I thought my August 2008-vintage 6.05% prime loan was bad enough.  Second, the fact that a new car is popular with poor people is not exactly a ringing endorsement.  Third, if you do want one of these cars, you may find a few on the repo lot in the coming months or years as their buyers struggle with payments.  Hey, then more poor people can buy these cars in the pre-owned market!

Being on the above list isn’t necessarily a red flag for buyers the way a list of the most popular rental cars would be, but most of these vehicles (save the Sonic and Versa, and to a lesser degree the Forte) are close to the end of their life cycles, and there may be deals out there for buyers who don’t mind last year’s model – and who have some dirty laundry on their credit reports.

ChryslerGalantloansMitsubishisubprime

Mazda and Fiat To Co-Develop New Roadsters

05 Jun, 12

Romney Says He’ll Sell GM Stake Immediately

05 Jun, 12

Related Posts

Long Term Tests

Long Term Wrap-Up: 2013 Toyota Sienna XLE AWD

GM Cruise
News

Honda Will Invest $2.75B in GM’s Cruise...

Rotary Engine
News

Mazda is Bringing Back the Rotary Engine

Chris Haak
Chris is FMA's Founder and Editor-in-Chief. He has a lifelong love of everything automotive, having grown up as the son of a car dealer. Chris spent the past decade writing for, managing, and eventually owning Autosavant before selling the site to pursue other interests. A married father of two sons, Chris is also in the process of indoctrinating them into the world of cars and trucks.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Recent Posts

  • Long Term Wrap-Up: 2013 Toyota Sienna XLE AWD
  • Honda Will Invest $2.75B in GM’s Cruise Autonomous-Vehicle Unit
  • Mazda is Bringing Back the Rotary Engine
  • Goodbye, NAFTA. Hello NAFTA 2.0 (USMCA)
  • I May Have Been the First to Put BF Goodrich KO2s on an Audi Q5

Recent Comments

  • Jon on I May Have Been the First to Put BF Goodrich KO2s on an Audi Q5
  • chrisadm on I May Have Been the First to Put BF Goodrich KO2s on an Audi Q5
  • Christopher Smith on I May Have Been the First to Put BF Goodrich KO2s on an Audi Q5
  • Christopher Smith on I May Have Been the First to Put BF Goodrich KO2s on an Audi Q5
  • Chris Haak on I May Have Been the First to Put BF Goodrich KO2s on an Audi Q5

Advert

Instagram

Archives

  • March 2020
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • April 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007

  • Home
  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy