• Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • News
  • Reviews
  • Features
  • Editorials
  • Long Term Tests
  • Video

First Drive: 2013 Volkswagen Up!

Chris Haak/22 May, 12/1029/0
Reviews

Being a car guy, my automotive interests are actually mostly focused on two very different ends of the spectrum.  I love high-performing, high-horsepower cars.  Cars like the Audi R8 and Corvette ZR1 bring a huge, stupid grin to my face.  On the other end, however, I’m a student of vehicles that are small on the outside but fairly spacious inside.  In other words, I can appreciate a good packaging job more than the next guy.  I’ve been following the excruciatingly long gestation period of the Scion iQ for years, and was delighted to have the chance to drive a very different, but almost similar, Volkswagen Up! at a recent media event.

The Up! is Volkswagen’s city car, and it’s not sold in the US.  Ah yes, the forbidden fruit of non-US market vehicles rears its head again!  Unlike some cars in that category that actually do make it to these shores, don’t hold your breath on ever seeing this car at your local VW dealer in the US.  After all, VW doesn’t even offer the B-segment Polo in the US, and that’s a full size class larger than this pip-squeak is.  (As an aside, I can’t see any reason other than perhaps a weak dollar or high costs that the Polo is not sold here.  Plenty of that car’s direct competitors are doing fine, such as the Fiesta, Sonic, Fit, Yaris, Accent, Rio, Mazda2, and others).  At any rate, without the Polo bridging the gap between the Golf and Up!, forget about getting an Up! here.

When the Up! was first shown on the auto-show circuit as a concept, it was rear engine/rear wheel drive.  Does that sound like any other Volkswagen model in particular?  One that perhaps was designed by Dr. Porsche and sold in fundamentally the same form for several decades?  But when the Up! was translated into a production car, it changed to a more conventional front engine/front drive layout.

The particular tester I drove must have been, quite literally, right off the boat from Europe.  It still had its Euro-spec Wolfsburg front license plate (but a Michigan plate bolted to the back so it could be driven on US roads), a speedometer that displayed only km/h, and a navigation system that pushed the limits of my high school German studies some two decades ago.  One thing that is decidedly non-Continental about the Up! is that its small engine is powered by petrol, not diesel.  Right now, European buyers can’t even get a diesel Up!.  There might be one in the future, but how about a turbocharged Up! GTI with firmer suspension and plaid seats?  Now we’re talking.

I mentioned my fascination with packaging earlier, and just look at this car.  Very few front wheel drive cars have their wheels pushed to the corners to the degree that the Up!’s are; the Mini Cooper and Scion iQ come to mind.  Compared to, say, a Ford Fiesta, the Up! has almost nothing hanging over its front wheels.  (Its wheelbase is 95.3 inches while its length is just 139.4 inches.)  This makes the car’s profile look more upscale while maximizing interior and cargo volume – and helps weight distribution and handling.  In the driver’s seat, the Up! felt very much like a normally-sized car and not like a cartoonishly-small car like the Smart ForTwo.  In fact, even though I’m tall (6’4″), if I’m willing to sacrifice some of my own legroom, I could probably convince someone to sit behind me.  Cargo volume with the back seat still a seat (and not folded) is a respectable 9 cubic feet.

The Up! feels solid and well-assembled.  Not surprisingly, interior materials are a few grades below those in more-expensive VWs like the Golf, or even the Jetta.  Yet the hard plastic parts, though prevalent, aren’t shiny, and everything fit together well.  Switchgear was better than that in the $79,000 Cadillac Escalade I spent the past week driving.  The upper door panels are body colored (so red in this particular car), and everything was screwed together tightly.

There’s a 5 speed manual gearbox in this particular car, and it’s quite easy to use.  The clutch was easy to get used to and requires minimal effort to engage.  Though apparently I wasn’t bright enough to find the hood release to snap a photo of the engine bay, I was also completely ignorant to the fact that I was driving a car powered by a three cylinder engine.  To be sure, it felt down on power (the Up! is available in the Old World with a 60-horsepower three or a 75-horsepower variant; I’m fairly confident that this one had the more powerful engine), but still moved the Up! well enough.  In city environments where maneuverability is at a premium over outright power (and two-lane passing never happens), 75 horsepower is sufficient in this car.  Car and Driver estimates the Up!’s curb weight at just 2,150 pounds.

It’s not the most agile car in the world, with a somewhat light steering effort and a bit of body roll.  The little engine feels somewhat out of breath from the middle of its power band forward.  Yet there’s something charming about driving a Volkswagen that is perhaps more true to its roots than other models that share a name and shape with their iconic air-cooled, rear-engined predecessor.  I still don’t think Volkswagen would be bold enough to bring the Up! to North America, and even if it did, I suspect that after the early adopters’ demand is satisfied, it will start piling on dealer lots and slink back to its homeland.

Volkswagen may or may not be bold enough to sell this car in the US, but it was fun to get the opportunity to be perhaps the only person in the US who was driving an Up! at that given moment.  The sport-bike rider taking a break from his ride to ask me about the Up! also seemed to find it interesting.

Volkswagen provided the vehicle, insurance, and a few drops of gas for this review.

Up!VolkswagenVolkswagen Up!VW

Review: 2012 Buick Enclave AWD

22 May, 12

Review: 2012 Chevrolet Equinox LTZ V6 FWD

22 May, 12

Related Posts

Long Term Tests

Long Term Wrap-Up: 2013 Toyota Sienna XLE AWD

GM Cruise
News

Honda Will Invest $2.75B in GM’s Cruise...

Rotary Engine
News

Mazda is Bringing Back the Rotary Engine

Chris Haak
Chris is FMA's Founder and Editor-in-Chief. He has a lifelong love of everything automotive, having grown up as the son of a car dealer. Chris spent the past decade writing for, managing, and eventually owning Autosavant before selling the site to pursue other interests. A married father of two sons, Chris is also in the process of indoctrinating them into the world of cars and trucks.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Recent Posts

  • Long Term Wrap-Up: 2013 Toyota Sienna XLE AWD
  • Honda Will Invest $2.75B in GM’s Cruise Autonomous-Vehicle Unit
  • Mazda is Bringing Back the Rotary Engine
  • Goodbye, NAFTA. Hello NAFTA 2.0 (USMCA)
  • I May Have Been the First to Put BF Goodrich KO2s on an Audi Q5

Recent Comments

  • Jon on I May Have Been the First to Put BF Goodrich KO2s on an Audi Q5
  • chrisadm on I May Have Been the First to Put BF Goodrich KO2s on an Audi Q5
  • Christopher Smith on I May Have Been the First to Put BF Goodrich KO2s on an Audi Q5
  • Christopher Smith on I May Have Been the First to Put BF Goodrich KO2s on an Audi Q5
  • Chris Haak on I May Have Been the First to Put BF Goodrich KO2s on an Audi Q5

Advert

Instagram

Archives

  • March 2020
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • April 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007

  • Home
  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy