• Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • News
  • Reviews
  • Features
  • Editorials
  • Long Term Tests
  • Video

White House Signals that TARP Money Might Be Used for Bailout

Chris Haak/12 Dec, 08/745/0
News

By Chris Haak

12.12.2008

President Bush, probably (and fortunately) eager to avoid the black eye on his administration’s legacy should GM and Chrysler declare bankruptcy and eventually fold, has changed his position in light of the failure to pass the Detroit rescue package in the Senate last night.  Until today, Bush had been opposed to using some of the $700 billion in TARP (Troubled Asset Relieve Program) money – intended originally to purchase troubled assets from financial institutions, but actually used for the government to take a stake in financial institutions – to fund the immediate cash needs of Chrysler and GM.  Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson had previously indicated that he was not in favor of using TARP funds on the auto industry, but since his boss is now coming out in favor of doing so, “in light of Congress’ inaction,” Paulson would probably do what he’s told to do.  In fact, the Treasury Department issued a press release that said, “Because Congress failed to act, we will stand ready to prevent an imminent failure until Congress reconvenes and acts to address the long-term viability of the industry.”

White House spokeswoman Dana Perino said something that many proponents of the bridge loans have been saying all along; setting aside ideological differences, bankruptcy will tank the economy:  “Given the current weakened state of the U.S. economy, we will consider other options if necessary — including use of the TARP program — to prevent a collapse of troubled automakers.  A precipitous collapse of this industry would have a severe impact on our economy, and it would be irresponsible to further weaken and destabilize our economy at this time.”

GM, which had been obviously disappointed in the failure of the previous bill in the Senate, expressed gratitude and optimism that the White House was working to deal with the issues on its own.  In fact, CNN reported today that White House officials threatened Senate Republicans last night with the prospect of being forced to use TARP money to help the automakers if the bill failed to pass the Senate.  TARP is already a hot topic among members of Congress, who are frustrated with the way the money has been used and that many banks are using it to bolster their balance sheets without being any more willing to lend money to consumers or businesses.  Of the first tranche of $350 billion approved by Congress, all but $15 billion has been allocated to financial institutions, which conveniently allows enough money to fund the short term loans for Detroit.  Secretary Paulson is hoping to not need to tap the second $350 billion, punting the decision on how much to pay out and how to do it to his successor, Timothy Geithner.

Financial institutions that accept TARP money must also accept certain conditions on the use of the money, as well as certain executive compensation and other limits.  It is not yet clear what conditions would be attached to the money if it were to be provided to the Big Three (or GM and Chrysler alone at this point), but my guess is that the Treasury Department would impose similar conditions to those at least in the proposed House bill.

Once the 111th Congress is sworn in on January 6, Democrats will have a larger majority in both the House (where the rescue plan already had plenty of votes) and the Senate (where the House proposal was put to a procedural vote, which was to determine if there was enough support to advance the bill further; that vote was 52-35 with 42 Democrats and 10 Republicans voting “yes” and 3 Democrats and 32 Republicans voting “no.”  There will be at least seven additional Democratic Senators after January 6, so it’s entirely likely that not only will the companies be back in Washington asking for money again, but that their request will be met more favorably.

Probably because of suddenly less-bleak prospects for a bailout, GM’s stock was down only about 5% in midday trading, and the Dow Jones Industrial Average was down only about 1%.  I’m glad that this part of my market predictions from earlier today were incorrect.  Stay tuned for the latest news on this very dynamic subject.

COPYRIGHT Full Metal Autos – All Rights Reserved

bailoutChapter 11ChryslerFordGeorge W. BushGMHank PaulsonSenate RepublicansTARPTimothy GaithnerTreasury DepartmentWhite House

Detroit Bailout Dies in the Senate

12 Dec, 08

BMW Reveals 2010 Z4 In Advance of NAIAS Debut

12 Dec, 08

Related Posts

Long Term Tests

Long Term Wrap-Up: 2013 Toyota Sienna XLE AWD

GM Cruise
News

Honda Will Invest $2.75B in GM’s Cruise...

Rotary Engine
News

Mazda is Bringing Back the Rotary Engine

Chris Haak
Chris is FMA's Founder and Editor-in-Chief. He has a lifelong love of everything automotive, having grown up as the son of a car dealer. Chris spent the past decade writing for, managing, and eventually owning Autosavant before selling the site to pursue other interests. A married father of two sons, Chris is also in the process of indoctrinating them into the world of cars and trucks.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Recent Posts

  • Long Term Wrap-Up: 2013 Toyota Sienna XLE AWD
  • Honda Will Invest $2.75B in GM’s Cruise Autonomous-Vehicle Unit
  • Mazda is Bringing Back the Rotary Engine
  • Goodbye, NAFTA. Hello NAFTA 2.0 (USMCA)
  • I May Have Been the First to Put BF Goodrich KO2s on an Audi Q5

Recent Comments

  • Jon on I May Have Been the First to Put BF Goodrich KO2s on an Audi Q5
  • chrisadm on I May Have Been the First to Put BF Goodrich KO2s on an Audi Q5
  • Christopher Smith on I May Have Been the First to Put BF Goodrich KO2s on an Audi Q5
  • Christopher Smith on I May Have Been the First to Put BF Goodrich KO2s on an Audi Q5
  • Chris Haak on I May Have Been the First to Put BF Goodrich KO2s on an Audi Q5

Advert

Instagram

Archives

  • March 2020
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • April 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007

  • Home
  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy