• Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • News
  • Reviews
  • Features
  • Editorials
  • Long Term Tests
  • Video

Congressional Leaders Pelosi, Reid Push for Automaker Aid from $700 Billion Bailout Package

Chris Haak/09 Nov, 08/1034/0
News

By Chris Haak

11.09.2008

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid sent a joint letter to Treasury Secretary Hank Paulson in recent days asking that under the broad powers granted to him by Congress through the $700 billion TARP (Troubled Asset Relief Program) – otherwise known as the “Wall Street bailout” – he consider broadening the program to include helping the Detroit-based automakers.  Reid and Pelosi are also expected to deliver a similar letter to the White House this weekend.

The TARP program was crafted by Congress (with consultation with Paulson and the Treasury Department, as representatives of the Bush Administration) with the intent of shoring up the nation’s financial system by allowing the Treasury Secretary to purchase “troubled assets” from financial institutions to help those companies shore up their balance sheets and reduce the likelihood of further massive write-downs.

The Detroit Three have been getting some mixed signals from Washington for the past few weeks, but a lot of that depends on to whom they have been approaching with hats in hand.  Generally, Democrats such as Pelosi and Reid, and indeed President-elect Barack Obama, have been far more receptive to their requests for assistance, mainly due to concerns about the effect that a collapse of the industry would mean to the workforces and the unions that have historically been very supportive of Democratic candidates.

Republicans, on the other hand, have been more reluctant to offer aid to the industry other than the $25 billion approved for retooling automobile plants to produce fuel-efficient vehicles.  President Bush famously said three years ago that Detroit “needed to build relevant products” when dismissing the idea of loan guarantees or other assistance when the situation was far less dire for the three companies (back when they were some of the few unhealthy companies in an otherwise fairly-healthy economy).  Today, most sectors of the economy are showing weakness, and GM specifically is probably on its last few weeks before declaring bankruptcy without bailout money.  More recently, Bush’s spokesman Tony Fratto said that the TARP program wasn’t set up for buying equity stakes or otherwise assisting manufacturing companies such as automakers, so it remains an open question as to whether Secretary Paulson would be inclined to go against his boss’s philosophy to expand the reach of the TARP program from financial institutions to other sectors of the economy.  And if the automakers receive a few billion in aid, that creates the dual problems of reducing the funds available for the specific intent of the program going forward, and potentially creating a long line of companies with their hands out for bailout money.  The airline industry didn’t have a good summer, for example; will they want a chunkof that bailout money?

Further muddying the request is the fact that in about 2 1/2 months, a new administration will take over in Washington, so the Bush administration is not necessarily inclined to throw around any more taxpayer money until the Obama Administration takes over on January 20, letting the problems fall into the lap of the incoming president instead.  That’s fine in theory, but pretending that there’s enough time to not do anything will not work, as GM will probably not make it to January 20.  If the decision of policy makers in Washington is to let GM enter Chapter 11 and deal with the fallout on the back end in terms of unemployment benefits, re-training workers, etc. instead of on the front end, that’s fine, but it would be wise to make a decision – consulting between both the Bush and incoming Obama Administrations – considering the likely real and human costs of either alternative.  It’s possible that it would eventually be cheaper to bail the companies out now, but it’s also possible that bankruptcy would be cheaper for the taxpayers and the broader economy.

As I said on Friday, these are certainly interesting times.

COPYRIGHT Autosavnt – All Rights Reserved

$25 billion for plant retoolingsBarack ObamaGeorge W. BushGM bankruptcyGM running out of timeHarry ReidHenry Paulsonletter from Reid and Pelosi to Paulson on auto industryNancy PelosiSenate Majority LeaderSpeaker of the HouseTARPTreasury SecretaryTroubled Asset Relief Program

GM Bankruptcy May Occur Before End of Fourth...

09 Nov, 08

Buy an iPod Touch, Get a Free Ferrari

09 Nov, 08

Related Posts

Long Term Tests

Long Term Wrap-Up: 2013 Toyota Sienna XLE AWD

GM Cruise
News

Honda Will Invest $2.75B in GM’s Cruise...

Rotary Engine
News

Mazda is Bringing Back the Rotary Engine

Chris Haak
Chris is FMA's Founder and Editor-in-Chief. He has a lifelong love of everything automotive, having grown up as the son of a car dealer. Chris spent the past decade writing for, managing, and eventually owning Autosavant before selling the site to pursue other interests. A married father of two sons, Chris is also in the process of indoctrinating them into the world of cars and trucks.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Recent Posts

  • Long Term Wrap-Up: 2013 Toyota Sienna XLE AWD
  • Honda Will Invest $2.75B in GM’s Cruise Autonomous-Vehicle Unit
  • Mazda is Bringing Back the Rotary Engine
  • Goodbye, NAFTA. Hello NAFTA 2.0 (USMCA)
  • I May Have Been the First to Put BF Goodrich KO2s on an Audi Q5

Recent Comments

  • Jon on I May Have Been the First to Put BF Goodrich KO2s on an Audi Q5
  • chrisadm on I May Have Been the First to Put BF Goodrich KO2s on an Audi Q5
  • Christopher Smith on I May Have Been the First to Put BF Goodrich KO2s on an Audi Q5
  • Christopher Smith on I May Have Been the First to Put BF Goodrich KO2s on an Audi Q5
  • Chris Haak on I May Have Been the First to Put BF Goodrich KO2s on an Audi Q5

Advert

Instagram

Archives

  • March 2020
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • April 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007

  • Home
  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy