• Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • News
  • Reviews
  • Features
  • Editorials
  • Long Term Tests
  • Video

Chrysler To Refinance Debt, Repay Government Loans

Chris Haak/28 Apr, 11/991/0
EditorialsNews

By Chris Haak

Probably due to its much larger size, GM’s bailout and repayment of some government loans has drawn far more attention than the assistance provided to Chrysler has for the past several years.  Chrysler doesn’t even get the perk of a derogatory nickname like “Government Motors” has.

Former “Car Czar” Steven Rattner’s book described how the Obama administration was split nearly 50-50 on whether Chrysler was even worth rescuing, and not everyone is certain of the viability of the now Italian-American automaker in the coming years.

Today, though, the focus is on Chrysler.  The company announced this morning that it will repay its loans to the US and Canadian governments, totaling $7.53 billion USD, by the end of the second quarter this year.  In other words, they’ll be repaid within about two months.  It’s not to say that Chrysler will retire the debt, but rather, it’s refinancing the debt in the public markets.  Still, Chrysler repaying its government loans is a much bigger deal than when GM did it a  year ago because Chrysler’s rescue was structured very differently than GM’s was.

First, right out of bankruptcy, GM was majority owned by the US Treasury, and only had a few billion dollars in actual loans on the books.  Most of the assistance that GM received was in the form of the government acquiring a majority stake in the company.  When GM repaid its loans and made a big deal about it, the government was still its majority shareholder, and the loans only represented a portion of the total assistance package.  It was pretty clear to almost everyone that GM’s bragging about repaying its loans early was somewhat empty, considering the loans were only a small portion of the total package, and the money to pay them came from the Treasury’s other assistance.

But Chrysler’s rescue wasn’t nearly as heavily equity-based.  First, there’s the Fiat stake.  GM did not have another auto company holding a large stake the way Chrysler did post-bankruptcy, but Fiat owned a stake in Chrysler.  When Chrysler emerged from bankruptcy on June 1, 2009, Fiat was given management control of the company and a 20 percent ownership stake.  The UAW (67.69 percent), the US Treasury (9.85 percent), and Canadian government (2.46 percent) owned the rest of Chrysler.  There were then milestones built into the agreement that allowed Fiat to receive an increasingly-larger ownership stake in Chrysler.

Fiat currently owns 30 percent of Chrysler; by repaying government loans, Fiat gains the right to purchase 16 percent of Chrysler, which will take its stake to 46 percent.  Though Fiat has provided Chrysler with valuable management services and intellectual property, the $1.27 billion USD that Fiat pays for 16 percent of Chrysler will actually be the first and only time that the Italian automaker has to put any of its cash toward Chrysler.  Once US production  of a 40 MPG vehicle begins – likely sometime this fall – Fiat will receive the final five percent of Chrysler, taking its stake to 51 percent, and giving Fiat control.  Marchionne has mentioned a few times that after that milestone, he may merge Fiat and Chrysler under a single global headquarters – which could even be in Auburn Hills, Michigan – but that’s a story for another day.  The Italians may have something to say about that as well.

Another key difference in the structure of Chrysler’s financing post-Chapter 11 versus GM’s is that Chrysler was saddled with more debt, particularly proportionate to the overall size of the assistance that each company received.  Chrysler’s remaining $7.53 billion in debt to the US and Canadian governments carries a high cost, and not all of that is political/ideological.  According to CEO Sergio Marchionne, the government loans carry interest rates as high as 14 percent on US borrowings and 20 percent on Canadian borrowings.  Refinancing the debt will cause an immediate reduction interest expenses on the order of between $270 million and $500 million, depending on which analyst does the calculations.

The specific debt issues that Chrysler has in mind are in three pieces:

  • A $3.5 billion USD term loan
  • $2.5 billion USD in bonds
  • $1.5 billion USD revolving credit line

According to Chrysler, the debt will be sold to institutional investors in a private offering.  Such a move would avoid the need to undertake the complexity of an SEC registration.

Getting out from under government ownership will have numerous other benefits for Chrysler, besides merely saving money on interest payments.  Executive compensation limits under TARP’s rules for companies that received “extraordinary assistance” from the US government go away, so Uncle Sam no longer can tell Chrysler how much it should pay executives, or how those pay packages should be structured.  It removes some of the stigma of government ownership from buyers’ eyes.  And it sets up the company as a more attractive investment opportunity before it undertakes an IPO, likely to occur in 2012.

We’re never going to recover all of the money that the US Treasury “invested” in the US auto industry during the depths of the Great Recession.  Now that capital markets have come back to life, auto industry sales have somewhat recovered, and there is an opportunity for the government to get the hell out of the car business, it’s time to make pragmatic decisions and let these companies run (or not, as the case may be) under private investors.

Further reading:
http://media.chrysler.com/newsrelease.do?id=10854&mid=2
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-04-27/chrysler-said-to-plan-to-borrow-6-billion-to-refinance-government-debts.html
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-04-28/chrysler-to-fully-repay-7-53-billion-in-u-s-canada-loans-this-quarter.html
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704330404576290720377789998.html
http://www.autonews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20110428/OEM/110429873/1424

bailoutbankruptcyChapter 11ChryslerChrysler GroupChrysler Group LLCFiatloan repaymentloansrefinancingSergio MarchionneTARP

Lexus Boss Mark Templin Predicts a Dismal Future...

28 Apr, 11

New York’s New Taxi Will Be a Nissan Van

28 Apr, 11

Related Posts

Long Term Tests

Long Term Wrap-Up: 2013 Toyota Sienna XLE AWD

GM Cruise
News

Honda Will Invest $2.75B in GM’s Cruise...

Rotary Engine
News

Mazda is Bringing Back the Rotary Engine

Chris Haak
Chris is FMA's Founder and Editor-in-Chief. He has a lifelong love of everything automotive, having grown up as the son of a car dealer. Chris spent the past decade writing for, managing, and eventually owning Autosavant before selling the site to pursue other interests. A married father of two sons, Chris is also in the process of indoctrinating them into the world of cars and trucks.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Recent Posts

  • Long Term Wrap-Up: 2013 Toyota Sienna XLE AWD
  • Honda Will Invest $2.75B in GM’s Cruise Autonomous-Vehicle Unit
  • Mazda is Bringing Back the Rotary Engine
  • Goodbye, NAFTA. Hello NAFTA 2.0 (USMCA)
  • I May Have Been the First to Put BF Goodrich KO2s on an Audi Q5

Recent Comments

  • Jon on I May Have Been the First to Put BF Goodrich KO2s on an Audi Q5
  • chrisadm on I May Have Been the First to Put BF Goodrich KO2s on an Audi Q5
  • Christopher Smith on I May Have Been the First to Put BF Goodrich KO2s on an Audi Q5
  • Christopher Smith on I May Have Been the First to Put BF Goodrich KO2s on an Audi Q5
  • Chris Haak on I May Have Been the First to Put BF Goodrich KO2s on an Audi Q5

Advert

Instagram

Archives

  • March 2020
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • April 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007

  • Home
  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy