• Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • News
  • Reviews
  • Features
  • Editorials
  • Long Term Tests
  • Video

Building the 2011 Chevy Volt

Chris Haak/17 Oct, 08/1014/0
Features

By Sam Boni

10.17.2008

With little more than two years to go to before they are expected in showrooms; can they do it? You know it takes seven years to get a new car ready for production; General Motors is hustling to get their first “E-Flex” plug-in hybrid vehicle, the Volt, ready in less than five years. Oh, and this vehicle will feature new technology never used in a production car before.

Earlier this year, some automotive journalists (unfortunately, not us) were given a rare chance by GM some time ago to get an inside peek into their design studio. Working in a separate area from the main design area, a small team of 45 designers, stylists and engineers spend all their time solely on the Volt. They are trying to keep ‘car czar’ Bob Lutz’s promise of the 2010 year-end time frame for the Volt’s production start-up alive.

The Volt’s story began at a brainstorming session in January 2006; new vehicles for the next decade were imagined, discussed and discarded. Prior to the movie “Who Killed the Electric Car?” being released, Bob Lutz imagined a new type of electric vehicle, different than the infamous EV1. It should be able to fulfill most people’s commuter needs, but also be able to take a longer trip than the battery alone would allow.

Much progress had been made since the EV1 vehicles were crushed. For one, GM had presented an extremely popular concept in 2004, reminiscent of the 1950s’ famous Nomad station wagon, only smaller. What if the envisioned car would look similar to the new Nomad, could commute in city traffic on battery power and use a small engine for overland trips? — Not a hybrid like any other, but different.

The limited range of the previous electric vehicle was not acceptable, nor was its 1,200 pounds of battery weight. The new Lithium-Ion batteries showed promise; but to date, they were only used in small appliances and still had some problems. A comparable car battery could store four times the electrical energy than the familiar lead-acid type, but weigh only in the 300 pound range.

Trouble was that type of battery did not exist.

Undaunted, the design team started to develop the “new and improved” – should we call it EV2? In less than one year, the model makers had a car ready that earned rave reviews at the 2007 auto shows: this time, however the name ‘Volt’ was used.

Encouraged by the public’s perception, General Motors realized they had more than just another concept car in their hands — they might have a best-seller if they could shepherd it into production. GM awarded development contracts to two companies for large Lithium-Ion batteries soon after. By mid-2008, different batteries were being tested around the clock in current production cars rigged with an electric motor. Laboratory test were also being conducted to ensure that the battery will endure the discharge and re-charge cycles over 10 years or about 150,000 miles. “Not all lithium technology is the same,” explained Andy Farah, Volt’s chief engineer; A number of different chemistry combinations are being tested.

In the meantime, back at the small, special design center, the Volt, in the shape it was seen at the auto shows, was experiencing some nips and tucks. “We are now in the midst of a new period of aero exploration,” Ed Welburn, GM’s chief of design, admitted at the time. “There has been a significant effort by all our program teams to improve fuel economy thru aerodynamics, and now to extend the range of electric vehicles for the future.”

For smoother air flow, the Volt’s front fenders have been rounded off and the curved rear is more edgy and angular; the flat roof has a more pronounced curve now. Chevrolet chief designer Bob Boniface explained that the aerodynamic drag of the concept car has been cut by 30 percent at this stage, but he insists “It has to be true to the show car.”

That was then, this is now. Unfortunately, it no longer looks as exciting as the “2006 Volt car”: the Beauty has been turned into Beast; a production-line beast, looking more like most other cars. But, as they say, beauty is only skin-deep – it’s the underneath that counts. And that is what we are counting on: charging ahead to lower pollution, fuel consumption and elevating the prestige of the American auto industry to previous levels again.

When the Volt is being driven, the engine only cuts in to power the generator when the battery reaches a certain point of discharge. By mid-2008, hundreds of engineers are preparing every minute detail to get the first plug-in hybrid (PHEV) ready for mass production. GM’s goal is to have the Volt drive 65 km (40 miles) on battery power alone, before the engine starts. Many drivers may never use a drop of gasoline when they only commute a short distance and plug it in overnight. The Volt’s top speed is limited to 160 km/h, 0-100 km/h (62 mph) takes a scant 8.5 seconds, and its flex-fuel engine can use gasoline or ethanol. With the market’s volatility, the ‘Volt’ can not come soon enough.

Every other car maker is working on similar technology to reduce fuel consumption and with that CO2 emission. To stay in business, carmakers are preparing for the new age of clean, sustainable transportation. The billion dollar question that the Volt generates is whether it will be too expensive for consumers when it hits the market in late 2010, and whether it will be upstaged by less expensive competitors that have been springing up on the newswire for the past few months.

COPYRIGHT Full Metal Autos – All Rights Reserved

2011 Chevy VoltBob Lutzcar czarGM product developmentproduction Volt has a boring shapeVolt concept not aerodynamicwind tunnel

Batteries Included

17 Oct, 08

204 Horsepower, 165 lb ft of Torque, All...

17 Oct, 08

Related Posts

Long Term Tests

Long Term Wrap-Up: 2013 Toyota Sienna XLE AWD

GM Cruise
News

Honda Will Invest $2.75B in GM’s Cruise...

Rotary Engine
News

Mazda is Bringing Back the Rotary Engine

Chris Haak
Chris is FMA's Founder and Editor-in-Chief. He has a lifelong love of everything automotive, having grown up as the son of a car dealer. Chris spent the past decade writing for, managing, and eventually owning Autosavant before selling the site to pursue other interests. A married father of two sons, Chris is also in the process of indoctrinating them into the world of cars and trucks.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Recent Posts

  • Long Term Wrap-Up: 2013 Toyota Sienna XLE AWD
  • Honda Will Invest $2.75B in GM’s Cruise Autonomous-Vehicle Unit
  • Mazda is Bringing Back the Rotary Engine
  • Goodbye, NAFTA. Hello NAFTA 2.0 (USMCA)
  • I May Have Been the First to Put BF Goodrich KO2s on an Audi Q5

Recent Comments

  • Jon on I May Have Been the First to Put BF Goodrich KO2s on an Audi Q5
  • chrisadm on I May Have Been the First to Put BF Goodrich KO2s on an Audi Q5
  • Christopher Smith on I May Have Been the First to Put BF Goodrich KO2s on an Audi Q5
  • Christopher Smith on I May Have Been the First to Put BF Goodrich KO2s on an Audi Q5
  • Chris Haak on I May Have Been the First to Put BF Goodrich KO2s on an Audi Q5

Advert

Instagram

Archives

  • March 2020
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • April 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007

  • Home
  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy