• Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • News
  • Reviews
  • Features
  • Editorials
  • Long Term Tests
  • Video

Rolls-Royce Shows Phantom EV Prototype

Chris Haak/21 Feb, 11/1002/0
News

By Chris Haak

Rolls-Royce announced said on Sunday that it has developed an electrically-powered version of its Phantom flagship sedan, called the 102EX.  Though the company claims no production plans are in place for a Phantom EV, Rolls-Royce considers the car to be part of a program to test alternative drivetrains that could be used in future Rolls-Royce cars.

To date, most EVs have been built on economy-car platforms, since the batteries and control systems for an EV typically cost far more money to produce than do traditional internal-combustion engines and their related systems.  By pairing EVs with economy-car parts, the batteries and hardware can be smaller and less powerful, and the car won’t be prohibitively expensive.  However, at the end of the day, you have a $30,000 or $40,000 economy car.  Said another way, most EVs provide a small-car experience for the price of a luxury car.

The nice thing about a car that can easily top a half million dollars when a few option boxes are checked (one of my favorites is called “Drinks Cabinet Mounted in Rear Doors” for $18,200) is that it’s reasonably easy to bury the cost of the EV hardware.  The 6.8 liter (sorry – 6 ¾ liter) BMW-based V12 surely can’t be an inexpensive engine to build, so skipping that and the Phantom’s six-speed automatic probably knocks $20,000 to $25,000 off the car’s cost right off the bat.  There’s plenty of room in a car with a 140.6 inch wheelbase (150.4 inches for the extended wheelbase model) to hide a few battery packs, and it’s unlikely that the car’s massive chassis would notice a few hundred pounds of batteries, when it’s tipping the scales at around three tons in its standard form.

Rolls-Royce was careful to not say that the 102EX is a production prototype, or that the company even has production intent for the electrified Phantom.  Instead, Rolls is attempting to set the tone for the conversation with a website devoted to the car (http://www.electricluxury.com/) and with a YouTube video or two, where they ask the fundamental question of whether an electric Phantom is perfection or compromise.

Obviously, no journalists have yet had the chance to drive the 102EX, since the car only will make its debut on March 1 at the Geneva Motor Show.  It’s not hard at all to imagine that the 102EX could have very similar driving characteristics to the standard Phantom: effortless power, lots of torque, silent operation.  In fact, it’s likely considerably quieter inside than a standard Phantom, since there is no exhaust or induction noise or vibration to muffle or mask.  It will, quite likely, be a fortress of solitude on the highway.

However, it’s hard not to see the obvious compromise staring a potential owner in the face: range anxiety.  Who in the world would want a very big, very expensive, very fast luxury sedan if that car could run out of power after, say, 100-125 miles and require at a minimum a few hours to recharge and continue.  Is that not the defining compromise that any EV buyer has to accept, whether that person is buying a Mitsubishi i, Nissan Leaf, Mini E, or a Rolls-Royce Phantom EV?

The company plans to allow owners and other “thought leaders” to drive the prototype sometime after the Geneva show, and to proffer their opinions on whether the technology is ready to be accepted by the discriminating buyers who are considering a Rolls-Royce.

Now, combining a plug-in EV drivetrain with a powerful V8 (instead of V12) range extender in a future Phantom might be a more effective way to improve the standard Phantom’s abysmal fuel economy (11 MPG city/18 MPG highway) without sacrificing performance – or traveling range.  Right now, the 102EX seems as if it has the potential to be a white elephant with a cool, translucent Spirit of Ecstasy on its giant [now unnecessary] grille.

BMW electrificationCAFEelectric luxury carPhantom 102EXPhantom EV prototypeplug-in hybridprototype EVRolls-Royce

Big Changes in Store for Smart USA

21 Feb, 11

Hyundai Sonata Hybrid Deliveries Delayed

21 Feb, 11

Related Posts

Long Term Tests

Long Term Wrap-Up: 2013 Toyota Sienna XLE AWD

GM Cruise
News

Honda Will Invest $2.75B in GM’s Cruise...

Rotary Engine
News

Mazda is Bringing Back the Rotary Engine

Chris Haak
Chris is FMA's Founder and Editor-in-Chief. He has a lifelong love of everything automotive, having grown up as the son of a car dealer. Chris spent the past decade writing for, managing, and eventually owning Autosavant before selling the site to pursue other interests. A married father of two sons, Chris is also in the process of indoctrinating them into the world of cars and trucks.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Recent Posts

  • Long Term Wrap-Up: 2013 Toyota Sienna XLE AWD
  • Honda Will Invest $2.75B in GM’s Cruise Autonomous-Vehicle Unit
  • Mazda is Bringing Back the Rotary Engine
  • Goodbye, NAFTA. Hello NAFTA 2.0 (USMCA)
  • I May Have Been the First to Put BF Goodrich KO2s on an Audi Q5

Recent Comments

  • Jon on I May Have Been the First to Put BF Goodrich KO2s on an Audi Q5
  • chrisadm on I May Have Been the First to Put BF Goodrich KO2s on an Audi Q5
  • Christopher Smith on I May Have Been the First to Put BF Goodrich KO2s on an Audi Q5
  • Christopher Smith on I May Have Been the First to Put BF Goodrich KO2s on an Audi Q5
  • Chris Haak on I May Have Been the First to Put BF Goodrich KO2s on an Audi Q5

Advert

Instagram

Archives

  • March 2020
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • April 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007

  • Home
  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy