• Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • News
  • Reviews
  • Features
  • Editorials
  • Long Term Tests
  • Video

Volt Rated at 93 MPGe, Leaf at 99 MPGe

Chris Haak/25 Nov, 10/968/0
News

By Chris Haak

This past week, the EPA released the long-awaited official mileage estimates for the two newest kids on the block, the Nissan Leaf and Chevrolet Volt.  Because both cars are capable of running without burning gasoline (in fact, the Leaf cannot use gasoline at all), many were curious as to how the Monroney stickers would turn out for these two trendsetting automobiles.  So now we have the answers, and they are probably more realistic and more relevant when comparing against other cars than some of the initial claims that had been thrown out by both GM and Nissan.

Far from the 230 miles per gallon claim that GM threw out there about the Volt over a year ago (to the chagrin of the EPA, which had, at the time, not been anywhere near finalizing their methodology to establish comparable fuel-economy scores), the Volt came in at a MPGe (miles per gallon equivalent) of 93 miles per gallon (combined city/highway) when running in EV mode, with an estimated range of 35 miles.  In gas-only mode (known as “charge-sustaining mode” in Volt parlance, the EPA estimates a city/highway combined 37 miles per gallon, with a range of 344 miles.  Altogether, starting with a full battery and a full tank of gas, the Volt should travel 379 miles before needing a fillup.  The EPA also estimates a 60 mile per gallon composite between EV and gasoline propulsion.

For the Leaf, the EV number is even further from Nissan’s 367 MPG fantasy number that Nissan threw out in response to Chevy’s 230 mile per gallon claim.  The Leaf came in at 99 MPGe combined, which breaks down to 106 MPGe city and 92 MPG3 highway ratings.  The EPA also estimates a 73 mile range, which is below the company’s claims of 80-100 miles.

The new labels are similar to what consumers are used to seeing from more conventional vehicles, but offer some additional information.  For instance, both cars’ labels provide charging time estimates at 240 volts (seven hours for the Leaf, four hours for the Volt).  The EPA assumes a cost per kWh of 11 cents, and provides an annual cost estimate for the Volt under each mode, and for the Leaf.  With that electricity cost assumption, the Volt would cost $601 to drive 15,000 miles per year in EV-only mode, and the Leaf would cost $561.  Assuming $3.20 for each gallon of premium unleaded that the Volt requires for its gasoline engine, it would cost $1,302 to travel 15,000 miles per year in charge-sustaining mode only.  In all likelihood, the reality would fall somewhere between the two numbers for the Volt, depending upon how it is driven.

Another nice feature on the labels, though admittedly buried in the fine print, is consumption data rather than only economy data.  The Leaf consumes 34 kWh per 100 miles, and the Volt consumes 36 kWh per 100 miles in EV mode and 2.7 gallons per 100 miles.  Most countries around the world present fuel consumption data (amount consumed per a distance, for example liters per 100 km) rather than fuel economy data (distance per a unit consumed, for example miles per gallon), so this is an important step in unifying expectations of consumers around the world.

Coming up with a way to present fuel economy for vehicles that don’t use fuel (or, in the Volt’s case, don’t always use fuel) wasn’t an easy challenge, and there are sure to be a number of critics of the EPA’s methodology.  GM “worked with” the EPA in coming up with a relevant and useful label, but the fact that the Volt’s final number was less than half of GM’s 230 MPG claim may indicate that there was no undue influence on the General’s part in the process.  To me, the stickers do a reasonably-good job of distilling complex information into a summary that makes comparisons with conventional vehicles.

Chevrolet Voltelectric vehicleEPAEVfuel consumptionfuel economyhybridLeafNissan LeafPHEVVolt

GM Pulls off a Successful IPO at $33 Per Share

25 Nov, 10

China’s 2010 Auto Sales Could Top 18

25 Nov, 10

Related Posts

Long Term Tests

Long Term Wrap-Up: 2013 Toyota Sienna XLE AWD

GM Cruise
News

Honda Will Invest $2.75B in GM’s Cruise...

Rotary Engine
News

Mazda is Bringing Back the Rotary Engine

Chris Haak
Chris is FMA's Founder and Editor-in-Chief. He has a lifelong love of everything automotive, having grown up as the son of a car dealer. Chris spent the past decade writing for, managing, and eventually owning Autosavant before selling the site to pursue other interests. A married father of two sons, Chris is also in the process of indoctrinating them into the world of cars and trucks.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Recent Posts

  • Long Term Wrap-Up: 2013 Toyota Sienna XLE AWD
  • Honda Will Invest $2.75B in GM’s Cruise Autonomous-Vehicle Unit
  • Mazda is Bringing Back the Rotary Engine
  • Goodbye, NAFTA. Hello NAFTA 2.0 (USMCA)
  • I May Have Been the First to Put BF Goodrich KO2s on an Audi Q5

Recent Comments

  • Jon on I May Have Been the First to Put BF Goodrich KO2s on an Audi Q5
  • chrisadm on I May Have Been the First to Put BF Goodrich KO2s on an Audi Q5
  • Christopher Smith on I May Have Been the First to Put BF Goodrich KO2s on an Audi Q5
  • Christopher Smith on I May Have Been the First to Put BF Goodrich KO2s on an Audi Q5
  • Chris Haak on I May Have Been the First to Put BF Goodrich KO2s on an Audi Q5

Advert

Instagram

Archives

  • March 2020
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • April 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007

  • Home
  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy