• Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • News
  • Reviews
  • Features
  • Editorials
  • Long Term Tests
  • Video

2011 Chrysler 200, AKA Sebring, Breaks Cover

Chris Haak/14 Oct, 10/931/0
News

Few new cars have been as unloved by retail consumers as has Chrysler’s Sebring.  Showcasing the very worst of what Daimler felt Chrysler stood for:  tacky hood strakes, overdone chrome, poor proportions, a plastic-heavy interior, and subpar powertrains, the third generation Sebring hit the new-car market with a thud, and proceeded to lose nearly every comparison test it found itself in.  Chrysler still needed to keep its factories humming, though, and the smallest of the Detroit 3 found willing buyers of Sebrings at rental car lots across the country, almost certainly at deeply-discounted prices.

Chrysler’s Fiat overlords are well aware of the Sebring’s probems, which we were so gracious as to point out last month – heck, even Cerberus was aware of them.  But in this case, the new management team has actually done something.  Ding, dong, the Sebring’s dead.  Say hello to the 2011 Chrysler 200, which is really just a heavily-revised Sebring.  The 200 shares the Sebring’s hard points (doors, greenhouse, and wheelbase), but appears to have finally become the car that Chrysler should have introduced in 2007 instead of the Sebring that was bestowed upon us.

Taking a page from GM’s change-names-every-generation playbook (i.e., Cavalier begat the Cobalt, Cobalt begat the Cruze) in an attempt to confuse fool customers into disassociating the brand with previous lackluster efforts, the 200 takes its name from the Chrysler 200C EV concept that the company showed at the Detroit auto show in January 2009.  The name is clearly an attempt to capitalize also upon the positive image that flagship 300C full-size sedan enjoys.

We haven’t yet seen the 200 in person, much less sat in it or driven it, but the changes appear to be substantive and credible.  The 200 gets the new Pentastar V6 as the buy-up engine, good for an impressive 283 horsepower and 260 lb-ft of torque in the 200, revised suspension geometry (to hopefully help some of the suspension issues that we noted in our 2010 Sebring review of a few weeks ago), as well as a new interior and acoustic laminated windshield and front door glass for improved noise isolation.

The Sebring’s looks always bothered me, and considering their canvas, Chrysler’s designers have done a remarkable job turning the Sebring into the 200.  While it’s not particularly distinctive in its appearance, the front and rear ends are much-improved over the Sebring.  Of note, among the multitude of photos that Chrysler released of the 200, it did not provide any straight profile shots, nor did it provide any shots capturing the rear three-quarter view.  Those would instantly reveal the 200’s Sebring-based roots.  The front three-quarter shots are carefully angled to give the impression that this is a more extensive overhaul than it really is, but the long hood, short deck proportions of the Sebring are forced to remain, by necessity.

It’s hard to envision the 200 setting the sales charts on fire, but it is certainly a nicely-done piece of work considering what Chrysler’s design team had as its starting point.  The 2011 Chrysler 200 is just a stopgap anyway, intended to slow the bleeding and generate some interest in the brand while it busily works on the next-generation midsize sedan, which will share architecture with any number of cars from across the Fiat empire.

200ChryslerChrysler 200Chrysler Sebringmidsize sedanSebringSebring refresh

smart USA Signs Memorandum of Understanding With...

14 Oct, 10

EPA Approves E15 Ethanol-Gasoline Blend

14 Oct, 10

Related Posts

Long Term Tests

Long Term Wrap-Up: 2013 Toyota Sienna XLE AWD

GM Cruise
News

Honda Will Invest $2.75B in GM’s Cruise...

Rotary Engine
News

Mazda is Bringing Back the Rotary Engine

Chris Haak
Chris is FMA's Founder and Editor-in-Chief. He has a lifelong love of everything automotive, having grown up as the son of a car dealer. Chris spent the past decade writing for, managing, and eventually owning Autosavant before selling the site to pursue other interests. A married father of two sons, Chris is also in the process of indoctrinating them into the world of cars and trucks.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Recent Posts

  • Long Term Wrap-Up: 2013 Toyota Sienna XLE AWD
  • Honda Will Invest $2.75B in GM’s Cruise Autonomous-Vehicle Unit
  • Mazda is Bringing Back the Rotary Engine
  • Goodbye, NAFTA. Hello NAFTA 2.0 (USMCA)
  • I May Have Been the First to Put BF Goodrich KO2s on an Audi Q5

Recent Comments

  • Jon on I May Have Been the First to Put BF Goodrich KO2s on an Audi Q5
  • chrisadm on I May Have Been the First to Put BF Goodrich KO2s on an Audi Q5
  • Christopher Smith on I May Have Been the First to Put BF Goodrich KO2s on an Audi Q5
  • Christopher Smith on I May Have Been the First to Put BF Goodrich KO2s on an Audi Q5
  • Chris Haak on I May Have Been the First to Put BF Goodrich KO2s on an Audi Q5

Advert

Instagram

Archives

  • March 2020
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • April 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007

  • Home
  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy