• Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • News
  • Reviews
  • Features
  • Editorials
  • Long Term Tests
  • Video

Patent Drawings Show Chrysler 200C Taking Shape

Chris Haak/02 Aug, 10/927/0
News

By Chris Haak

Ten years ago – heck, even five years ago – few companies made a bigger splash at the North American International Auto Show in Detroit with its concept and production car reveals than Chrysler did. Some of the more notable ones were Jeeps crashing through glass walls, or even the 2008 Ram 1500 making its debut on the street in front of the Cobo Arena with the help of a few dozen amorous cattle.

Chrysler also managed to display some fantastic concept cars over the years – many of which became full-fledged production cars (Viper, Prowler, Intrepid) and many others that may not have reached production in their own right, but that inspired other Chrysler, Dodge, and Jeep vehicles in one way or another.  For example, the Dodge M80 pickup concept from 2002 shares many of its design features with the production Dodge Nitro SUV introduced five years later.

But somewhere along the way, Chrysler apparently lost its mojo for rolling out great-looking, interesting, desirable concept cars.  Most of what we’ve seen from Detroit’s smallest automaker on the auto show circuit in recent years has been either a gaudy, ugly concept (check out the unloved Chrysler Imperial concept for an example of unloved concepts) or simply a variation of an existing production car – like the Avenger Stormtrooper concept shown at the 2007 SEMA show.

However, Chrysler did knock the ball out of the park with one particular concept car in recent years:  the Chrysler 200C sedan from the 2009 Detroit show.  This car had graceful curves, athletic proportions, and a luxurious interior.  In other words, everything Chrysler’s current midsize offering, the Sebring, does not offer.  Too, the 200C was rear wheel drive (which helps the cars proportions and its stature among enthusiasts) and was a range-extended electric vehicle in the mold of the Chevy Volt, only cooler and better-looking.

Of course, in January 2009, Chrysler was about to enter Chapter 11, and had just launched the current Sebring, so production of anything like the 200C in the short-term seemed pretty unlikely, so many folks (myself included) almost forgot about the 200C and considered it more of an exercise of what could have been, had Daimler not “helped” Chrysler so much with the Sebring.

Now, here we are today with news from Noticas Automotive (via Autoblog) that Chrysler has filed a patent application for what appears to be the production 200C’s design.  (We have no confirmation that the production car, if it even takes this form, will carry the 200C name).  What we do know, however, is that the patent drawings appear to be almost – if not completely – identical to the design of the concept shown 18 months ago in Detroit.  Should this pan out to a production car, maybe Chrysler – or its design department – isn’t dead in the water after all.

One of us said in January 2009 that the 200C was “the best looking design [he’s] seen out of Chrysler, ever,” and I agree with that.  Should this car replace the Sebring at some point, the transformation would be even more remarkable than the Ford Taurus’ change from the “Homer Simpson” Taurus to the “Superman Taurus.”

The profile shot displayed at Noticas Automotive shows a car that is retaining the dash-to-axle ratio of a rear wheel drive car, which could mean one of two things:  either the patents are just on the design of the concept car, or the production car is going to be rear wheel drive based, perhaps on a shrunken version of the big brother 300C’s platform.  The latter would obviously be the better news, but could also limit the car’s potential mass-market appeal, since rear wheel drive cars aren’t foul-weather friendly and can’t be as space efficient as a front-driver.  In particular, a rear wheel drive car requires a driveline tunnel on the floor to accommodate a driveshaft to the rear differential.

Congrats to Noticas Automotive for finding these drawings, and let’s keep our fingers crossed that a future Chrysler midsize sedan – though almost certainly not the slightly-refreshed 2011 Sebring – will carry most of the good looks of the 2009 Chrysler 200C concept.  Having the 200C concept’s plug-in hybrid drivetrain would be even nicer to have in the production car, at least as an option.

200CChryslerChrysler 200CleaksNoticas Automotivepatent

What Does an Inside-Out Volkswagen Look Like?

02 Aug, 10

2011 Ford Super Duty Gets Torque Upgrade to 800...

02 Aug, 10

Related Posts

Long Term Tests

Long Term Wrap-Up: 2013 Toyota Sienna XLE AWD

GM Cruise
News

Honda Will Invest $2.75B in GM’s Cruise...

Rotary Engine
News

Mazda is Bringing Back the Rotary Engine

Chris Haak
Chris is FMA's Founder and Editor-in-Chief. He has a lifelong love of everything automotive, having grown up as the son of a car dealer. Chris spent the past decade writing for, managing, and eventually owning Autosavant before selling the site to pursue other interests. A married father of two sons, Chris is also in the process of indoctrinating them into the world of cars and trucks.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Recent Posts

  • Long Term Wrap-Up: 2013 Toyota Sienna XLE AWD
  • Honda Will Invest $2.75B in GM’s Cruise Autonomous-Vehicle Unit
  • Mazda is Bringing Back the Rotary Engine
  • Goodbye, NAFTA. Hello NAFTA 2.0 (USMCA)
  • I May Have Been the First to Put BF Goodrich KO2s on an Audi Q5

Recent Comments

  • Jon on I May Have Been the First to Put BF Goodrich KO2s on an Audi Q5
  • chrisadm on I May Have Been the First to Put BF Goodrich KO2s on an Audi Q5
  • Christopher Smith on I May Have Been the First to Put BF Goodrich KO2s on an Audi Q5
  • Christopher Smith on I May Have Been the First to Put BF Goodrich KO2s on an Audi Q5
  • Chris Haak on I May Have Been the First to Put BF Goodrich KO2s on an Audi Q5

Advert

Instagram

Archives

  • March 2020
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • April 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007

  • Home
  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy