• Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • News
  • Reviews
  • Features
  • Editorials
  • Long Term Tests
  • Video

Vehicle Safety Bill Moves Toward Senate Vote

Chris Haak/09 Jun, 10/875/0
News

By Chris Haak

In response to the Toyota recall crisis and the subsequent furor over when vehicles should be recalled, how large fines for deliberate noncompliance should be, a bill is working its way through the Senate Commerce Committee that would bolster new vehicle safety regulations.  If the amendments proposed by Sen. Jay Rockefeller (D-WV) to the bill passes committee as expected, the bill will be put to a vote on the Senate floor shortly thereafter.

The bill as proposed is less strict than the original proposals that had been floating about.  Credit a mix of common sense and intense auto industry lobbying for moderating many of the original bill’s provisions, including stopping-distance performance requirements with the mandatory brake override (these have been eliminated) and a 75-second event data recording requirement (this has been dramatically reduced).

As originally drafted, the Motor Vehicle Safety Act of 2010 bill called for:

  • A stopping-distance requirement, even with an open throttle
  • Minimum distance requirements between the brake and accelerator pedals
  • A standard requirements on keyless ignition systems
  • A standard that governs electronic vehicle controls
  • Event data recorders (“black boxes”) that record 60 seconds before a crash and 15 seconds after a crash.  The recorder must also be waterproof and fireproof.
  • Civil penalties would increase from $5,000 per vehicle to $25,000 per vehicle.

The amendment specifically changes:

  • Brake override systems are required, but without a stopping-distance requirement
  • Black boxes no longer have to record 75 seconds and no longer have to be water resistant, which would have added considerable cost to the price of a new vehicle
  • The cap on aggregate fines would increase from $16.4 million to $300 million

If the measure passes the Senate, there are a few provisions in the House version of the legislation (also called the Motor Vehicle Safety Act of 2010) that would have to be reconciled.  The House version calls for an aggregate cap of $200 million, rather than $300 million.  The House bill calls for a $9 per vehicle fee to fund the NHTSA, which the Senate bill does not include.

The act is expected to eventually be passed by this fall.

black boxevent data recorderMotor Vehicle Safety Act of 2010NHTSARecallSen. Jay RockefellerSenateToyota

The Week of Recalls Continues

09 Jun, 10

EPA Announces Top-Ten Fuel Sipper Lists,...

09 Jun, 10

Related Posts

Long Term Tests

Long Term Wrap-Up: 2013 Toyota Sienna XLE AWD

GM Cruise
News

Honda Will Invest $2.75B in GM’s Cruise...

Rotary Engine
News

Mazda is Bringing Back the Rotary Engine

Chris Haak
Chris is FMA's Founder and Editor-in-Chief. He has a lifelong love of everything automotive, having grown up as the son of a car dealer. Chris spent the past decade writing for, managing, and eventually owning Autosavant before selling the site to pursue other interests. A married father of two sons, Chris is also in the process of indoctrinating them into the world of cars and trucks.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Recent Posts

  • Long Term Wrap-Up: 2013 Toyota Sienna XLE AWD
  • Honda Will Invest $2.75B in GM’s Cruise Autonomous-Vehicle Unit
  • Mazda is Bringing Back the Rotary Engine
  • Goodbye, NAFTA. Hello NAFTA 2.0 (USMCA)
  • I May Have Been the First to Put BF Goodrich KO2s on an Audi Q5

Recent Comments

  • Jon on I May Have Been the First to Put BF Goodrich KO2s on an Audi Q5
  • chrisadm on I May Have Been the First to Put BF Goodrich KO2s on an Audi Q5
  • Christopher Smith on I May Have Been the First to Put BF Goodrich KO2s on an Audi Q5
  • Christopher Smith on I May Have Been the First to Put BF Goodrich KO2s on an Audi Q5
  • Chris Haak on I May Have Been the First to Put BF Goodrich KO2s on an Audi Q5

Advert

Instagram

Archives

  • March 2020
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • April 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007

  • Home
  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy