• Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • News
  • Reviews
  • Features
  • Editorials
  • Long Term Tests
  • Video

Chrysler Plans to Keep SRT Alive and Kicking

Chris Haak/10 Mar, 09/858/0
News

In spite of the recent news that GM was shuttering its High Performance Vehicle Operations team – the group that brought us the Cadillac V-series cars, among others – struggling crosstown rival Chrysler LLC does not plan to follow in kind with its well-regarded SRT team.  Chrysler confirmed this in a live online chat with its much-maligned consumer advisory panel, and posted the transcript on its Red Letter Dodge blog.

According to the transcript (complete with spelling errors), panel members asked Steve Bartoli, Chrysler’s VP for global product planning about the future of SRT.  According to Bartoli, “SRT is sticking around and we have to make final calls on the lineup. We are big fans of SRT what is does for us and our customers.”  Further, he added that “Ceberus [sic] is committed to this cause.”  Good news, indeed.

Chrysler’s SRT team has churned out several very good performance versions that transformed fairly mediocre products into legitimate performance vehicles.  Tracks on SRT’s “greatest hits” album include the Neon-based SRT4, Crossfire SRT6, Caliber SRT4, Grand Cherokee SRT8, Challenger SRT8, Magnum SRT8, Charger SRT8, 300C SRT-8, Ram SRT-10, and of course the Viper SRT10.  Of these vehicles, the Caliber SRT4, Grand Cherokee SRT8, Challenger SRT8, Charger SRT8, 300C SRT8, and Viper SRT10 are still in production.  All of the SRT-touched vehicles have improved handling, braking, and acceleration relative to their more pedestrian cousins.

As to what Bartoli meant when he said that they had to make final calls on the lineup, it’s anyone’s guess.  I would imagine that, if the Fiat deal goes through, there will be little need for the Caliber in the lineup, with more desirable Fiat-based B- and C-segment cars in the offing, so that could mean the demise of the Caliber SRT4.  The Viper is on its way out the door if Cerberus can manage to sell that business (and will likely be buried if it can’t find a buyer), so there goes another one.  With a new Grand Cherokee (with one exterior and one interior illustration included in Chrysler’s viability presentation to the Federal government last month) about to make its debut in New York in April, the SRT8 version of that will likely go away with the new generation, and my guess is that will likely be permanent instead of temporary.

This leaves nothing but the SRT8 versions of the rear wheel drive LX cars (Charger, Challenger, and 300C) in the lineup.  A new generation of the 300C and Charger are due to be released shortly; I’d imagine that if SRT is going to continue, Chrysler would continue with SRT8 versions of these vehicles fairly soon after the launch of the new models.  Of course, the SRT8 Challenger will probably continue throughout the duration of the Challenger’s life cycle, as an SRT8 variant of that car is all but critical to its credibility as a performance vehicle, the inherent goodness of the mid-level Challenger R/T notwithstanding.

Perhaps Chrysler’s SRT team has some more product enhancements on the horizon.  They might as well not bother with an SRT version of the dead-on-the-vine Avenger and Sebring midsize sedans, but there’s opportunity to put the awesome 6.1 liter Hemi under the Ram pickup’s hood to make a slightly-less politically incorrect SRT pickup than the late, great Ram SRT10, which had the Viper’s 500-horsepower V10 underhood.  There might also be an opportunity for SRT to wave its magic wand on some of the Fiat products, and in particular the Fiat-platformed, Chrysler-bodied ones, in the coming years.

SRT is apparently going to live to see another day.  Let’s hope that no matter what form it takes, performance vehicles will always have a place at Chrysler.

Caliber SRT4Challenger R/TChallenger SRT8Crossfire SRT6Fiat-based Chryslersfuture Chrysler SRT productsGrand Cherokee SRT8is Chrysler going to continue making performance cars?Neon SRT4Ram SRT8

California May Agree To Withdraw Its Emissions...

10 Mar, 09

GM Shelves Innovative New 4.5 Liter V8 Diesel

10 Mar, 09

Related Posts

Long Term Tests

Long Term Wrap-Up: 2013 Toyota Sienna XLE AWD

GM Cruise
News

Honda Will Invest $2.75B in GM’s Cruise...

Rotary Engine
News

Mazda is Bringing Back the Rotary Engine

Chris Haak
Chris is FMA's Founder and Editor-in-Chief. He has a lifelong love of everything automotive, having grown up as the son of a car dealer. Chris spent the past decade writing for, managing, and eventually owning Autosavant before selling the site to pursue other interests. A married father of two sons, Chris is also in the process of indoctrinating them into the world of cars and trucks.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Recent Posts

  • Long Term Wrap-Up: 2013 Toyota Sienna XLE AWD
  • Honda Will Invest $2.75B in GM’s Cruise Autonomous-Vehicle Unit
  • Mazda is Bringing Back the Rotary Engine
  • Goodbye, NAFTA. Hello NAFTA 2.0 (USMCA)
  • I May Have Been the First to Put BF Goodrich KO2s on an Audi Q5

Recent Comments

  • Jon on I May Have Been the First to Put BF Goodrich KO2s on an Audi Q5
  • chrisadm on I May Have Been the First to Put BF Goodrich KO2s on an Audi Q5
  • Christopher Smith on I May Have Been the First to Put BF Goodrich KO2s on an Audi Q5
  • Christopher Smith on I May Have Been the First to Put BF Goodrich KO2s on an Audi Q5
  • Chris Haak on I May Have Been the First to Put BF Goodrich KO2s on an Audi Q5

Advert

Instagram

Archives

  • March 2020
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • April 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007

  • Home
  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy