• Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • News
  • Reviews
  • Features
  • Editorials
  • Long Term Tests
  • Video

The Tucker Torpedo…What if?

Chris Haak/20 Aug, 08/1182/0
Features

By Chris Hussey

08.20.2008

As a native of Tupelo, Mississippi, one of my favorite places to frequent is the Tupelo Automobile Museum. While I love perusing the entire collection, I am always drawn to one vehicle: Preston Tucker’s 1948 four-door sedan, affectionately known as the Tucker Torpedo. Billed at the time as “The Most Completely New Car in Fifty Years,” the Tucker surprised the entire automobile industry by living up to that billing. The Tucker 48 represented the car of the future to a car-starved post-WWII America.

The 128-inch wheelbase Tucker was only 60 inches high, which is much lower than other automobiles of the era. However, Tucker didn’t stop there. He added an independent suspension and a rear-mounted flat six engine derived from a war-time air-cooled helicopter unit featuring a fully sealed water cooling system, another first in the automotive industry.

The Tucker was also years ahead in terms of safety features. With a padded dash, front passengers had a “safety chamber” where they could “dive” in case of pending collision, and the windshield was designed to pop out harmlessly upon impact. The most noticeable difference was the central “Cyclops” headlight which turned with the front wheels. Luxury automakers have just recently (60 years later) attempted similar rotating headlights.

All of the above are facts and statistics that you could read anywhere. You’ll never appreciate the Tucker for what it is until you see one in person next to product offerings from other automakers of the period. The body styling is stunning; it appears to be muscular and sleek at the same time. The massive chrome bumpers and vents speak to the car’s luxury, and the fastback four door design calls to mind the forthcoming Aston Martin Rapide. When you sit in the driver’s seat of the Tucker 48, every control falls to your fingertips, as all of the instruments are mounted on the steering column. This innovation allowed for the access space under the dashboard dubbed the “safety chamber.” It’s as if Preston Tucker and the car’s designer, Alex Tremulis, studied Detroit’s contemporary offerings and found ways to improve on nearly every facet.

It’s a shame to think of what happened to the Tucker. Always just a few dollars away from having enough money to successfully build his company, Tucker tried some innovative capital raising schemes such as pre-selling franchises and accessories before the cars were delivered, some of which ran afoul of the SEC. In an open letter published in major newspapers of the day, Preston Tucker contended that his more established competitors from Detroit, along with their allies in Washington, knew that Tucker had designed was a better car, and it scared them. Eventually, Tucker and seven of his associates faced a Grand Jury indictment on 25 counts of mail fraud and 5 counts of violating SEC regulations. The prosecution had to prove that there was no possibility of building the car, but the problem was, the car was under production prior to the trial, in spite of over a thousand workers having been laid off when the SEC swarmed the plant. The jury found the defendants not guilty on all counts, but the company had already been lost to bankruptcy, and the Tucker Corporation no longer existed. Isn’t it ironic that today, state and local governments will give foreign automakers hundreds of millions of dollars just to build a single plant in the U.S., while in Tucker’s day, parts of the government did everything possible to keep the Tucker 48 out of production?

After sitting in the beautiful Ivory Tucker now retired in the Tupelo Automobile Museum, I can’t help but wonder, ”What if? What if Preston Tucker wouldn’t have succumbed to one of the Big Three? What would the Tucker be today? Would it be another sad example of brand proliferation, or would the innovation spurred by the Tucker have kept Detroit at the center of the automobile world?” Sadly, we will never know the answers to any of these questions. All we have left are 47 of the original 51 production Tuckers still in existence today; an attractive reminder of some very unattractive times in automotive history.

COPYRIGHT Full Metal Autos – All Rights Reserved

194847 cars exist todayAlex TremulisDetroitpost-warPreston Tuckerrear-mounted flat-sixsafety equipmentSECTucker TorpedoTupelo Automobile MuseumTupelo MS

2009 Model Year Preview Part 3 (N to V)

20 Aug, 08

Go Trabi, Go

20 Aug, 08

Related Posts

Long Term Tests

Long Term Wrap-Up: 2013 Toyota Sienna XLE AWD

GM Cruise
News

Honda Will Invest $2.75B in GM’s Cruise...

Rotary Engine
News

Mazda is Bringing Back the Rotary Engine

Chris Haak
Chris is FMA's Founder and Editor-in-Chief. He has a lifelong love of everything automotive, having grown up as the son of a car dealer. Chris spent the past decade writing for, managing, and eventually owning Autosavant before selling the site to pursue other interests. A married father of two sons, Chris is also in the process of indoctrinating them into the world of cars and trucks.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Recent Posts

  • Long Term Wrap-Up: 2013 Toyota Sienna XLE AWD
  • Honda Will Invest $2.75B in GM’s Cruise Autonomous-Vehicle Unit
  • Mazda is Bringing Back the Rotary Engine
  • Goodbye, NAFTA. Hello NAFTA 2.0 (USMCA)
  • I May Have Been the First to Put BF Goodrich KO2s on an Audi Q5

Recent Comments

  • Jon on I May Have Been the First to Put BF Goodrich KO2s on an Audi Q5
  • chrisadm on I May Have Been the First to Put BF Goodrich KO2s on an Audi Q5
  • Christopher Smith on I May Have Been the First to Put BF Goodrich KO2s on an Audi Q5
  • Christopher Smith on I May Have Been the First to Put BF Goodrich KO2s on an Audi Q5
  • Chris Haak on I May Have Been the First to Put BF Goodrich KO2s on an Audi Q5

Advert

Instagram

Archives

  • March 2020
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • April 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007

  • Home
  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy