• Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • News
  • Reviews
  • Features
  • Editorials
  • Long Term Tests
  • Video

Sirius-XM Merger Finally Approved After 16 Months

Chris Haak/26 Jul, 08/804/0
News

Sirius and XM announced their intention to merge in March 2007. A year later, in March 2008, that they still expected the merger to be approved, and finally when the Department of Justice approved the merger on antitrust grounds. The last remaining obstacle – albeit a theoretically formidable one – was the FCC. The FCC voted on Friday to allow the merger to proceed, so it’s likely to close as quickly as the companies are able – even as soon as next week.

The FCC is composed of five commissioners – three Republicans and two Democrats. At the time that the FCC granted the licenses to the two satellite radio companies, the agency had a formal rule on the books that said the companies could never combine. Meanwhile, in spite of growing their audience to just below 20 million users combined, both companies remain mired in losses and have become sob stories for their long-suffering shareholders.

In spite of the no-merger rule, nearly everyone expected the deal to eventually be approved, but with some conditions attached to it, because without a merger, neither company is probably viable for the long-term without significantly cutting back on programming and marketing expenditures. The companies successfully argued that their combination was not a monopoly, because they not only competed with each other, but also iPods, CDs, terrestrial radio, and now HD radio.

The conditions that the companies had to agree to in order to secure the merger’s approval included settling enforcement actions (fines) regarding unauthorized terrestrial signal repeaters and too-powerful transmitters in portable radios that the companies had previously sold to consumers. The total cost to settle will be $19.7 million, which is peanuts compared to the cost savings the companies will enjoy by combining operations. Other concessions the companies agreed to were a three-year price freeze, the addition of some a la carte programming choices (allowing customers to, in some cases, pay for only the channels that they want), and setting aside eight percent of their combined channels for the public interest and minority programming. Further, the companies agreed to release an interoperable radio that receives both services within one year, and to have an open standard on the technology that allows more innovation in radio development, hopefully bringing more device manufacturers into the fold in the future.

As I said before, I was initially opposed to this merger based on my expectation that it would give the combined company too much pricing power, but I really do enjoy satellite radio service, and if prices will be frozen, with the possibility that I could eliminate several unwanted channels from my lineup and potentially save some money, plus the availability of the best of Sirius on my XM radios at some point, it might not be all bad. Now, if my six month old portable XM radio (a Pioneer Inno) stops working before it’s worn out, or the built-in XM radio in my Honda is no longer compatible with the combined service, then I reserve the right to change my mind and complain about the merger. I also promise to complain – loudly – if the companies jack up prices in three years. But, based on the premise that for the next three years I should get more programming for the same price, or less programming for a lower price, I’m glad that the FCC finally approved the merger.

WSJ Report Says Chrysler Financial Will Stop...

26 Jul, 08

Premium Pricing Coming to California HOV Lane for...

26 Jul, 08

Related Posts

Long Term Tests

Long Term Wrap-Up: 2013 Toyota Sienna XLE AWD

GM Cruise
News

Honda Will Invest $2.75B in GM’s Cruise...

Rotary Engine
News

Mazda is Bringing Back the Rotary Engine

Chris Haak
Chris is FMA's Founder and Editor-in-Chief. He has a lifelong love of everything automotive, having grown up as the son of a car dealer. Chris spent the past decade writing for, managing, and eventually owning Autosavant before selling the site to pursue other interests. A married father of two sons, Chris is also in the process of indoctrinating them into the world of cars and trucks.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Recent Posts

  • Long Term Wrap-Up: 2013 Toyota Sienna XLE AWD
  • Honda Will Invest $2.75B in GM’s Cruise Autonomous-Vehicle Unit
  • Mazda is Bringing Back the Rotary Engine
  • Goodbye, NAFTA. Hello NAFTA 2.0 (USMCA)
  • I May Have Been the First to Put BF Goodrich KO2s on an Audi Q5

Recent Comments

  • Jon on I May Have Been the First to Put BF Goodrich KO2s on an Audi Q5
  • chrisadm on I May Have Been the First to Put BF Goodrich KO2s on an Audi Q5
  • Christopher Smith on I May Have Been the First to Put BF Goodrich KO2s on an Audi Q5
  • Christopher Smith on I May Have Been the First to Put BF Goodrich KO2s on an Audi Q5
  • Chris Haak on I May Have Been the First to Put BF Goodrich KO2s on an Audi Q5

Advert

Instagram

Archives

  • March 2020
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • April 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007

  • Home
  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy